On 23 aug, 22:17, "ßDoüg±Ç" <noün...@now.com> wrote: <pba...@worldonline.nl> wrote in message news:4f8f109c-cc7b-4c65-975e-5adfabf6c17a@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com... On 18 aug, 22:24, "---ooO-(_)-Ooo---" <k...@roy.here> wrote: pba...@worldonline.nl wrote: On 17 aug, 22:32, +++^^^+++ <m...@ow.ser> wrote: pba...@worldonline.nl wrote: On 17

Larry Hewitt wrote: "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message "Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message "Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message "CB" <CB@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message CB wrote: "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net>

"Adam Thirnis" <adam.thirnis@gmail.com> writes: Sawfish wrote: "Adam Thirnis" <adam.thirnis@gmail.com> writes: If the one-handed back hand were so fundamentally inferior there's no way there could be so many great players with one-handers - it would be a weakness that would be simply torn apart by opponents. There may be some validity to the view that 2 hands is

"Adam Thirnis" <adam.thirnis@gmail.com> writes: If the one-handed back hand were so fundamentally inferior there's no way there could be so many great players with one-handers - it would be a weakness that would be simply torn apart by opponents. There may be some validity to the view that 2 hands is steadier and more consistent especially on clay - but even then there have been plenty