Björn Olde schrieb: hoffmann@fho-emden.de schrieb: hoffm...@fho-emden.de schrieb: Björn Olde schrieb: Hi there, I need some help to calculate the moment of Inertia of a Shape with N EdgePoints. I also wasn't able to find the Equation of the moment of Inertia of a Ellipse. For the Ellipse I use 1/2m*(rx�+ry�) , I changed the Equation
hoffm...@fho-emden.de schrieb: Björn Olde schrieb: Hi there, I need some help to calculate the moment of Inertia of a Shape with N EdgePoints. I also wasn't able to find the Equation of the moment of Inertia of a Ellipse. For the Ellipse I use 1/2m*(rx�+ry�) , I changed the Equation of the Circle to this but I don't know if it is correct. But
"Hugh Clary" <badinage@netzero.ZAPTHISnet> wrote in message news:4885a2e8.6123500@news.individual.net... I am looking for an understandable definition of angular momentum. Definitions abound on the internet, but they are all incomprehensible, at least to me: http://tinyurl.com/5tfaxf Beyond that, apparently the planets Jupiter and Saturn possess some 90%% of our solar system's
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> writes: On 2007-11-24, Joe Riel <joer@san.rr.com> wrote: bicycle_disciple <1.crazyboy.only@gmail.com> writes: [...] Why is it poor? How off is one potentially going to be? I thought the 100 swings sort of evens things out, and you get a good figure, but I understand this is not a foolproof method. You are computing the rotation inertia
bicycle_disciple <1.crazyboy.only@gmail.com> writes: On Nov 23, 7:54 pm, Joe Riel <j...@san.rr.com> wrote: bicycle_disciple <1.crazyboy.o...@gmail.com> writes: This will surely make it to my blog. B.D http://cozybeehive.blogspot.com That [method used on your blog, and described by analyticcycling] is a poor way to measure rotational inertia. I discussed
