Foredoom
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 134 articles for 0.303 sec
John McAdams wrote: > On 23 Dec 2008 08:37:00 -0500, "Gary Aguilar" <garaguilar@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Happy holidays! >> >> Those of you who have contributed to/followed the discussion of JFK >> and Vietnam may find a new (auto)biography of/about McGeorge Bundy >> worth looking over. Apparently "Mac" Bundy has thrown in his lot with >> Warren skeptics. >> >> Adding     

Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in alt.assassination.jfk
Author: Anthony Marsh
Date: Dec 24, 2008 21:13

"Communicating at Translight Velocities" In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century
Show full article (28.10Kb)
"Communicating at Translight Velocities" In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Emit
Date: Aug 19, 2008 07:02

"Communicating at Translight Velocities" In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century
Show full article (15.44Kb)
On Jul 4, 8:48 pm, Anon <anonamoos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > On Jul 3, 7:16 pm, spinoza1111 <spinoza1...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > >  "In this chapter I present a > > reading of Measure for Measure which argues that not only Isabella’s > > speech, but the entire play, > > was in fact written with the authorship question in mind. My argument > > is organized into five acts, > > corresponding to     

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in sci.physics.particle
Author: Emit
Date: Aug 19, 2008 07:02

On Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:43:11 -0500, Rich Rostrom <rrostrom.21stcentury@rcn.com> wrote: 1) No Churchill. That NYC cab either kills him or leaves him so injured that he has to give up politics. OK I'll tackle this one. How about WI Churchill is involved in a sex scandal around the abdication crisis? Or WI Neville Chamberlain in May 1940 is in the best of physical health -
Show full article (15.44Kb)
"Communicating at Translight Velocities" In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in sci.physics
Author: Emit
Date: Aug 19, 2008 07:02

"Communicating at Translight Velocities" In the 19th century, science had concluded that reality was based upon the Aether, a rigid medium that pervaded all of space. The Aether was required to account for the ability of forces (electric, magnetic, gravitational, etc.) to "act at distance" and through which the vibrational disturbance known as light could propagate. Late in the century
Show full article (15.44Kb)
On Jun 5, 7:54 pm, ADR <aretz...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 4, 12:14 pm, andyto...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 7:22 pm, ADR <aretz...@yahoo.com> wrote: (snip) > > > > You are totally wrong.  The laws of physics that essentially control > > > this universe have no physical manifestation.  We know that Newtonian > > > physics is correct (mostly) because we can use it to send satellites     

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: spinoza1111
Date: Jul 5, 2008 05:56

"Martin Shackelford" <mshack4@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:gyP1k.4261$co7.3384@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com... I was responding to your post saying that no one paraphrased Mary's e-mail. It wasn't true. I said no one paraphrased Mary's email? That WAS the main point of that post. Martin It was the main point of *that* post becuase in *that* post you ignored the main points
Show full article (14.00Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in soc.history.whatif
Author: The Horny Goat
Date: Jun 28, 2008 17:26

Show full article (6.15Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Ino
Date: Jun 13, 2008 06:59

Show full article (15.44Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in sci.physics.particle
Author: Ino
Date: Jun 13, 2008 06:58

Show full article (15.44Kb)
    

Group: alt.news.macedonia · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in alt.news.macedonia
Author: andytoole
Date: Jun 6, 2008 10:28

Show full article (23.06Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Foredoom in alt.assassination.jfk
Author: Michael O'Dell
Date: Jun 5, 2008 12:50

Show full article (25.38Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next