On 28 mar, 06:41, Roaringriri <roaringr...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: ampana a écrit : On 27 mar, 09:53, Roaringriri <roaringr...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Vlad Defives a écrit :> In article <64vcliF2dt7v...@mid.individual.net>, jacky.devere...@tiscali.be says... Beep Beep nous a concocté: Source d'une telle affirmation? Coupure de journaux de cette époque?
On 27 mar, 09:53, Roaringriri <roaringr...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: Vlad Defives a écrit :> In article <64vcliF2dt7v...@mid.individual.net>, jacky.devere...@tiscali.be says... Beep Beep nous a concocté: Source d'une telle affirmation? Coupure de journaux de cette époque? Heu ! si c'est faux pourquoi s'est elle excusée ?? Source d'une telle affirmation? Coupure
Hi Peter. To maintain your essay intact, I thought it best to quote as follows, Dr. Enders wrote, (Between +++++ and ---------) +++++ I would like to demonstrate you the benefit of Newtonian thinking for modern physics in providing the gauge symmetry of the Schroedinger equation with a physical rather only mathematical foundation. Let me start with the following observation for quantum
Let me clarify our problem. We solve a coupled second order differential equation with periodic coefficient using one of Matlab's ode solvers. We first convert them into four first order equations and then integrate them over one time period for four different sets of initial conditions (using, say, ode15s). The values of the dependent variables (say, y1(t=T), y2(t=T), y3(t=T), y4(t=T)) for the
