Fishfacts
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 9 articles for 0.302 sec
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:11:58 +0100, Michael Fritz wrote: > If CodeGear should focus on other things than supporting PNGs why do they > support the bitmap format in their components at the end? <Personal Opinion> Back when Delphi 1 was launched, Borland would have had no momentum in the third party market, and without some sort of image support I doubt that they would have had much traction     

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: Marc Rohloff [TeamB]
Date: Feb 15, 2008 14:02

On 21 Nov 2007 22:49:27 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote in <4744b5f7$0$82076$dbd49001@news.wanadoo.nl> : kangaroo16 <kangaroo16@invalid.com> wrote: On 21 Nov 2007 18:40:27 GMT, Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote in <47447b9b$0$54356$dbd4b001@news.wanadoo.nl> : [...] One can "criticize" someone else without "correcting" them, but perhaps not
Show full article (0.73Kb) · Show article thread
Wayne, > It is also only for .Net, not Win32. <grin> there's always a catch ... but there are actually /two/ catches it doesn't come with Pro. Yes ... it should, even if it's a slightly dummed down version. No, Bold isn't the answer either - been there, done that, bought the book: http://mda-delphi.com/articles.php?lng=en&pg=78 Can you imagine doing FishFacts or MastApp with Bold? Like     

Group: rec.travel.australia+nz · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in rec.travel.australia+nz
Author: kangaroo16
Date: Nov 21, 2007 17:33

Bob Dawson wrote: If you took the Fishfact demo seriously as a larger claim, you're the first person I've ever met who did. I really don't, it was offered as an absurd example. The larger point here is that the current Delphi for .NET strategy is one of code migration/compatibility with Win32, which is problematic IMO. Now, a cross platform strategy (not a cross runtime) will have similar
Show full article (5.17Kb) · Show article thread
"Brian Moelk" wrote > Bob Dawson wrote: > > Total strawman. Please cite a CodeGear statement based on that > > assumption, or claiming that all w32 code will transition to .NET > > effectively with a simple recompile. > > Fishfact. Fishfact showed that for a simple case, recompiling is possible (which it is), and nothing more. If you took the Fishfact demo seriously as a larger claim,     

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: Dave Keighan
Date: Nov 19, 2007 15:02

Bob Dawson wrote: Total strawman. Please cite a CodeGear statement based on that assumption, or claiming that all w32 code will transition to .NET effectively with a simple recompile. Fishfact. Nor did they simply recompile the VCL to produce the VCL.NET themselves. Sure. But VCL isn't a complete abstraction. I think her comments are accurate. Of course they are
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:14:08 +0200, beldin@belgarath.net (Beldin) wrote in message <f928kg$5ln$1@news.newsland.it>: >l regaleco o "re delle >arringhe" che ha forma serpentiforme ed è lungo fino ad 8 metri, Regalecus glesne. Il mio Costa, Atlante dei pesci dei mari italiani, dice che arriva al massimo a tre metri, comunque ecco qua un bell'esemplare: http://www.fortunecity.es/poetas/cuen     

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: Brian Moelk
Date: Aug 31, 2007 06:59

MarkIII wrote: grazie della precisazione. Ne avevo il sospetto, visto che specificano che vive a 600 m (se e' una nuova specie come fai a sapere dove vive?). Quindi non e' vero neanche che ci sono suoi resti fossili risalenti a 80 milioni di anni fa? (che e'? Cretaceo, mi pare). Le sei branchie e la bocca frontale comunque sono peculiari. Al momento non ho molto tempo per leggere, ma grazie
Show full article (1.39Kb) · Show article thread
Ladybat ha scritto: > che ne pensate? > > http://tv.repubblica.it/multimedia/home/539540 Non è un mostro, non è fossile, non è preistorico, non è sconosciuto. Della bestia si sa molto. E stato descritto nel1884 (o circa). C'è in un libro della Fao sugli squali del 1984. Se vuoi ti mando il pdf. E' il classico caso di notizia affrettata, diciamo così. MarkIII P. S. Si chiama Chlamydoselachus     

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: Bob Dawson
Date: Aug 31, 2007 06:44

Show full article (0.71Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: borland.public.delphi.nontechnical · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in borland.public.delphi.nontechnical
Author: Brian Moelk
Date: Aug 31, 2007 05:05

Show full article (2.20Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: it.discussioni.misteri · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in it.discussioni.misteri
Author: Bhisma
Date: Aug 4, 2007 16:25

Show full article (1.14Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: it.scienza.biologia · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in it.scienza.biologia
Author: Ladybat
Date: Jan 26, 2007 03:23

Show full article (1.04Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: it.scienza.biologia · Group Profile · Search for Fishfacts in it.scienza.biologia
Author: MarkIII
Date: Jan 25, 2007 15:11

Show full article (0.62Kb) · Show article thread