... 19, 12:46 pm, Gary Scott <garylsc...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Here's what I need in a "final" procedure. Of course normal termination isn't a problem, but I have various I/O boards that I need ... does count down to zero, an interrupt will cause a callback to a procedure/process that does some cleanup...come to think of it I have two ...

On Sep 19, 12:46 pm, Gary Scott <garylsc...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Here's what I need in a "final" procedure. Of course normal termination isn't a problem, but I have various I/O boards that I need to ensure are properly terminated/safed (put in a known state (e.g. not transmitting, outputs reconfigured to ...

Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Here's what I need in a "final" procedure. ... in the event of a program crash. The standard doesn't and can't guarantee anything about that. That's true of all versions, and for that matter to a certain extent of all languages. "Crashes" can happen for many reasons, but most of ...

Here's what I need in a "final" procedure. Of course normal termination isn't a problem, but I have various I/O boards that I need to ensure are properly terminated/safed (put in a known state (e.g. not transmitting, outputs reconfigured to inputs) in the event of a program crash. This is in part to ensure that transmitters aren't overheated from ...

...assumed size on the other hand does make sense to me (the procedure should be able to finalize all shapes), which is why I originally assumed it was meant ... on shape. I would certainly agree that you would want to make any non-scalar final procedure use assumed-shape, even if the standard doesn't happen to explicitly require it. Thank you ...

... me as a CHARACTER-value could never be finalized, could it? Now you are on the right...also correct that you can't write a final procedure for character (or any other intrinsic type...the other hand does make sense to me (the procedure should be able to finalize all shapes), which is why I originally assumed ... would want to make any non-scalar final procedure use assumed-shape, even if the ...

...I don't have access to the final standard) says in the section about FINAL procedures about the dummy argument of a FINAL procedure: "... All length type parameters of the dummy argument ... a CHARACTER-value could never be finalized, could it? My original conception of ... hand does make sense to me (the procedure should be able to finalize all shapes), which is why I originally ...

... guidance on where to start with these: 1. allocatable scalars 2. final procedures One of those Google SoC students mentioned elsewhere in this already undertook final procedures.  The patch will appear in 4.5. ...feature.  There's a bug report to check that intrinsic procedures use the Standard's name convention for formal arguments in...

... guidance on where to start with these: 1. allocatable scalars 2. final procedures One of those Google SoC students mentioned elsewhere in this already undertook final procedures. The patch will appear in 4.5. 3. ...a feature. There's a bug report to check that intrinsic procedures use the Standard's name convention for formal arguments in error ...

... to see the following implemented and will contribute if someone can give me specific guidance on where to start with these: 1. allocatable scalars 2. final procedures 3. polymorphic variables 4. type guard statements These are the most important things I need from gfortran to get it to compile a new code...