...>>> No. Quite the opposite. There's been overwhelming support for the manslaughter charge. Yes but the charge has been applied to the wrong person. ... the wrong time. A kid on a quad bike swerved out from behind an ...instrumental in placing that kid on that quad- bike on that road, as well as..., your logic would see the tree charged. Hmm, bit of a wooden response. ...

... there, that parent deserves to be fully prosecuted. Yes but not for manslaughter, unless THEY actually kill someone, which this father did not. Yes, he did. He was solely responsible for placing the child on the quad bike on the road, then - after the collision - taking the child home instead of calling for an ambulance immediately....

... whiter-than- white and blameless? No. Quite the opposite. There's been overwhelming support for the manslaughter charge. Yes but the charge has been applied to the wrong person. The killer should have been charged with manslaughter and the parent with something relating either to parental negligence or for allowing an untaxed and ...

...road are committing a criminal offence. The quad bike was not being used in accordance...motorists would be subject to the same charges as everyone else. So, if they intimidate they could be charged with terrorism. I have made it ... without intent should be charged with manslaughter, like everyone else, instead of the lesser special charges of careless or dangerous driving. ...

...-than- white and blameless? No. Quite the opposite. There's been overwhelming support for the manslaughter charge. Yes but the charge has been applied to the wrong person. The killer should have been charged with manslaughter and the parent with something relating either to parental negligence or for allowing an untaxed and ...

... isn't, motorists would be subject to the same charges as everyone else. So, if they intimidate they could be charged with terrorism. I have made it perfectly plain elsewhere that motorists who kill without intent should be charged with manslaughter, like everyone else, instead of the lesser special charges of careless or dangerous driving. Motorists frequently campaign ...

...>> No. Quite the opposite. There's been overwhelming support for the manslaughter charge. Yes but the charge has been applied to the wrong person. How on EARTH... at the wrong time. A kid on a quad bike swerved out from behind an coming vehicle ... on. The other "motorist" was instrumental in placing that kid on that quad- bike on that road, as well as failing ...

...-than- white and blameless? No. Quite the opposite. There's been overwhelming support for the manslaughter charge. Yes but the charge has been applied to the wrong person. The killer should have been charged with manslaughter and the parent with something relating either to parental negligence or for allowing an untaxed and uninsured vehicle ...

...of the news articles, then. Plenty of mentions of it. The father took the kid home. It wasn't until the kid collapsed later that the father phoned for an ambulance. The paramedic called for an air ambulance... so why do I waste my breath. Anyone's who's kid gets knocked off a quad bike by a range rover, and doesn't get them checked out is a cretin. Mike P...

...saying: Can you really not see the rather fundamental legal difference between a pedal cycle and a quad bike? In this case no. The girl wouldn't be allowed on the road on a pedal bike at that age either. Are you sure about that...? C'mon, show us which bit of legislation says that a 7yo can't ride a bike on the road...