...about doing something constructive and helpful for your species like... hmm.. i dunno... figure out how to end world hunger, poverty, etc. ? Nah, that'd be asking too much from the fartsy artsy's. They'd only complain that they couldn't get their tours booked, or their paintings displayed, or their sculptures bought. We have the power to do so much good, yet we ...

...> How about doing something constructive and helpful for your species like... hmm.. i dunno... figure out how to end world hunger, poverty, etc. ? Nah, that'd be asking too much from the fartsy artsy's. They'd only complain that they couldn't get their tours booked, or their paintings displayed, or their sculptures bought. We have the power to do so much good, yet we waste ...

...> How about doing something constructive and helpful for your species like... hmm.. i dunno... figure out how to end world hunger, poverty, etc. ? Nah, that'd be asking too much from the fartsy artsy's. They'd only complain that they couldn't get their tours booked, or their paintings displayed, or their sculptures bought. We have the power to do so much good, yet we waste ...

... me. How about doing something constructive and helpful for your species like... hmm.. i dunno... figure out how to end world hunger, poverty, etc. ? Nah, that'd be asking too much from the fartsy artsy's. They'd only complain that they couldn't get their tours booked, or their paintings displayed, or their sculptures bought. We have the power to do so much good, yet we waste it on ...

... three we've gotten in most years. If we're bitching about the nomination of mediocre films, why not replace the conventionally mediocre with the ambtiously mediocre? Personally, I'd rather have an artsy-fartsy, animated textbook like GITS 2 over a boilerplate, animated romantic comedy farce like Shark Tale, but that's just me. I guess no nominator ever walked out on a film that didn't ...

...the heroes of her novels, that's no evidence of anything but role-modelling and peer pressure. The reasons given weren't, as I claim, because Rand smoked. It was some artsy fartsy symbolism about the fire in the cigarette lighting the ideas of the individual... lots of mumbo jumbo I don't find to be particularly objective. It sounds like you're talking about...

... the heroes of her novels, that's no evidence of anything but role-modelling and peer pressure. The reasons given weren't, as I claim, because Rand smoked. It was some artsy fartsy symbolism about the fire in the cigarette lighting the ideas of the individual... lots of mumbo jumbo I don't find to be particularly objective. It sounds like you're talking ...

...or the heroes of her novels, that's no evidence of anything but role-modelling and peer pressure. The reasons given weren't, as I claim, because Rand smoked. It was some artsy fartsy symbolism about the fire in the cigarette lighting the ideas of the individual... lots of mumbo jumbo I don't find to be particularly objective. It sounds like you're talking about one ...

... or the heroes of her novels, that's no evidence of anything but role-modelling and peer pressure. The reasons given weren't, as I claim, because Rand smoked. It was some artsy fartsy symbolism about the fire in the cigarette lighting the ideas of the individual... lots of mumbo jumbo I don't find to be particularly objective. It sounds like you're talking about one...

... what a Rantard is. I do not at all mean to say that even the majority of Objectivists are like this. The reasons given weren't, as I claim, because Rand smoked. It was some artsy fartsy symbolism about the fire in the cigarette lighting the ideas of the individual... lots of mumbo jumbo I don't find to be particularly objective. It sounds like you're talking about one ...