... of the problem. And, of course, there ARE two sides to this problem. Carl...Stuff it up you ass. Exactly the kind of response, sans facts, I would expect from someone like you, arguing a factless, strictly emotionally biased position. If it makes you feel any better, I won't ("stuff it up my ass", that is). But I think I have stuffed it up yours. Re-read my post. ...

...problem. And, of course, there ARE two sides to this problem. Carl...Stuff it up you ass. Exactly the kind of response, sans facts, I would expect from someone like you, arguing a factless, strictly emotionally biased position. If it makes you feel any better, I won't ("stuff it up my ass", that is). But I think I have stuffed it up yours. Re-read my post. There's nothing ...

...for. The evidence that would determine the issue would simply be one that all agree upon. As long as there is dissent, then there is no final answer. Wrong. Mindless and factless dissent changes the facts, not one whit. What some consider are facts, others question. And, if they have NO rational basis for the questioning, thats not inquiry, thats stubborn denial. That ...

... any new claims with one eye to how well they do, or do not fit in with what there is already a long chain of peer reviewed evidence for. The evidence that would determine the issue would simply be one that all agree upon.  As long as there is dissent, then there is no final answer. Wrong. Mindless and factless dissent changes the facts, not one whit. Andre

... evidence for. The evidence that would determine the issue would simply be one that all agree upon. As long as there is dissent, then there is no final answer. Wrong. Mindless and factless dissent changes the facts, not one whit. What some consider are facts, others question. Just because a majority opinion says so and a book to go with it does not make it necessarily true....

... any new claims with one eye to how well they do, or do not fit in with what there is already a long chain of peer reviewed evidence for. The evidence that would determine the issue would simply be one that all agree upon.  As long as there is dissent, then there is no final answer. Wrong. Mindless and factless dissent changes the facts, not one whit. Andre

... should then examine any new claims with one eye to how well they do, or do not fit in with what there is already a long chain of peer reviewed evidence for. The evidence that would determine the issue would simply be one that all agree upon.  As long as there is dissent, then there is no final answer. Wrong. Mindless and factless dissent changes the facts, not one whit. Andre

... to substantiate those accusations 4. he is immune and exempt from the FRCP that require due diligence before any filing, but other people aren't. 5. he is entitled to unlimted discovery based on those factless accusations, but only him- no one else. 6. only those facts and those people's testimony he chooses can be allowed into the court reord. But back to Penny Parker. At the bottom of ...

...-year battle with members of the Scientific Establishment who want nothing to jeopardize their vested interests and, consequently, have surrendered their integrity to perpetuate the factless, facetious Theory of man's Evolution. < ========================================= < U.S. PROFESSIONAL SCIENTIFIC SOCIETES http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/SimplyMagic/TightFit.jpg Acoustical Society ...

... and conspiracy. < I might add there are more and more horror stories to go along with my fight against the Scientific Establishment which wants nothing more but to protect the factless, facetious Theory of man's Evolution. < But I'll save some of them for another day. < ===================================== < WORLDWIDE NEWS AGENCIES Associated Press AP African Eye News Service ...