"armpit" <armarmpitpit@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:upCdnbibetE3qYrVnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@giganews.com... "Rick" <pearl@cray.com> wrote in message news:29404c75-e1e9-4c1c-b26b-094ff9a0a58e@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Apr 29, 7:04 am, "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREM...@alltel.net> wrote: "armpit" <armarmpit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message Third, I'll bet Kyle is also
On Apr 29, 7:04 am, "Mike Marlow" <mmarlowREM...@alltel.net> wrote: "armpit" <armarmpit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message Third, I'll bet Kyle is also enjoying all you haters crying about his pass for the win. Too frickin' funny. Argh! Why did you have to go and add that last part? That's an Alan Jones thing - throwing the "haters" word in there. Because he lost the argument
Hi ..thanks for the response. I see your point, but I wonder if the search results were manipulated (say by Viagra advertisers), I would think real people would correct them back. Sort of like if a wikipedia page becomes vandalized, it quickly gets corrected. Tom The Gobbling Goblin wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:30:16 -0800 (PST), TomTall <tbensky@gmail.com> wrote: Hi gang-
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:34 -0800 (PST), mark r <markrush@gmail.com> wrote: stable for nov through jan I only remember seeing it #1 for a day or so. But then again, you were always dipping into the black/dark grey side of things. ;) that was enough then i was off the project (split up with my gf who owned the site) still that WAS the power of link exchanging Still is if done
From : http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7118452.stm A huge campaign to poison web searches and trick people into visiting malicious websites has been thwarted. The booby-trapped websites came up in search results for search terms such as "Christmas gifts" and "hospice". Windows users falling for the trick risked having their machine hijacked and personal information plundered.
