Faciality
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 383 articles for 0.329 sec
On Jul 4, 11:59 pm, don Gabacho <jpast...@nettaxi.com> wrote: > On Jul 3, 11:32 pm, don Gabacho <jpast...@nettaxi.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, July 3, 2011 1:44:09 PM UTC-4, Tom wrote: > > > On Jul 2, 9:52 pm, globular <takecar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > With effects today, the effects are the story. > > > More than you might suspect. > > > There are now companies supplying actors, props and     

Group: az.politics · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in az.politics
Author: don Gabacho
Date: Jul 10, 2011 22:15

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Derek C <del.copeland@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: So please explain why UK cyclist KSI statistics fell from 6900 in 1984 to 2450 in 2008, a pariod in which cycle helmet wearing has become more common, but has not been made compulsory. OK I know that some of the reduction is due to a reduction in the number of cyclists and cycle miles, but this doesn't
Show full article (2.06Kb) · Show article thread
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Derek C <del.copeland@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > So please explain why UK cyclist KSI statistics fell from 6900 in 1984 > to 2450 in 2008, a pariod in which cycle helmet wearing has become > more common, but has not been made compulsory. OK I know that some of > the reduction is due to a reduction in the number of cyclists and > cycle miles, but this doesn't     

Group: cam.transport · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in cam.transport
Author: Rob Morley
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:02

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Peter Clinch wrote: But if we've got people like Derek telling us we're eejits not to wear them because it's important not to get head injuries (though never quite managing to explain why they're okay if they don't happen falling off a bike) then that pushes the matter beyond "personal choice and nothing more", because we get people telling us we ought to wear them
Show full article (0.58Kb) · Show article thread
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Peter Clinch wrote: > But if we've got people like Derek telling us we're eejits not to wear > them because it's important not to get head injuries (though never quite > managing to explain why they're okay if they don't happen falling off a > bike) then that pushes the matter beyond "personal choice and nothing > more", because we get people telling us we ought to wear them     

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Rob Morley
Date: Jun 8, 2010 04:02

Toom Tabard wrote: Yes, it's the case that a proportion of the cyclists wearing helmets get protected from fatal head injuries and the mitigation will put them mainly in serious injury or lower categories. And despite this the rates of doom across populations magically remain undiminished. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext
Show full article (0.58Kb) · Show article thread
Toom Tabard wrote: > Yes, it's the case that a proportion of the cyclists wearing helmets > get protected from fatal head injuries and the mitigation will put > them mainly in serious injury or lower categories. And despite this the rates of doom across populations magically remain undiminished. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext     

Group: cam.transport · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in cam.transport
Author: Naich
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:59

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Derek C <del.copeland@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: These are the DfT KSI per billion passenger kilometres figure for 2007: Bus or coach 9 Cars 20 Pedestrians 382 Pedal cyclists 541 Motor cyclists 1116 Please note that pedal cycling is 19.1 times more dangerous than motoring and 1.42 times more dangerous than
Show full article (1.71Kb) · Show article thread
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Derek C <del.copeland@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > These are the DfT KSI per billion passenger kilometres figure for > 2007: > > Bus or coach 9 > Cars 20 > Pedestrians 382 > Pedal cyclists 541 > Motor cyclists 1116 > > Please note that pedal cycling is 19.1 times more dangerous than > motoring and 1.42 times more dangerous than     

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Naich
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:59

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /> <title>existing</title> </head> <body> <table align="center" border="0"> <tbody> <tr style="font-family: Verdana;"> <td style="text-align: center;">
Show full article (1.71Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: cam.transport · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in cam.transport
Author: Peter Clinch
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:56

Show full article (0.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Peter Clinch
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:56

Show full article (0.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: cam.transport · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in cam.transport
Author: Rob Morley
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:56

Show full article (0.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.rec.cycling · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in uk.rec.cycling
Author: Rob Morley
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:56

Show full article (0.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.alt.spamtrap · Group Profile · Search for Faciality in alt.alt.spamtrap
Author: abuse
Date: Jun 8, 2010 03:45

Show full article (10.88Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next