Eyes Have Not Seen
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 130079 articles for 2.960 sec
joea wrote: > joea;1643465 Wrote: >> Checking on a sent item, found stuff sent today, not seen. Created a >> all sent items folder, all are seen. >> >> All apparently relevant settings seem to be the same. >> >> ?? >> >> joe a. > > > Disregard. This was never posted. You never read this. > > Watch the spinning cursor. You are getting sleepy. Verrry sleeepy. > Now close your     

Group: novell.support.groupwise.7x.clients · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in novell.support.groupwise.7x.clients
Author: Michael Bell
Date: Sep 22, 2008 13:43

joea;1643465 Wrote: Checking on a sent item, found stuff sent today, not seen. Created a all sent items folder, all are seen. All apparently relevant settings seem to be the same. ?? joe a. Disregard. This was never posted. You never read this. Watch the spinning cursor. You are getting sleepy. Verrry sleeepy. Now close your eyes . . . joe a.
Show full article (0.44Kb)
Free Lunch wrote: > On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:54:17 -0400, Gabriel > <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism: > >> On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:48:12 -0400, Tim Miller >> <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Gabriel wrote: >>>> >>>> Correction: given the belief you ascribe to the evidence. To >>>> those who do not reject God as a possibility, the evidence shows >>     

Group: novell.support.groupwise.7x.clients · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in novell.support.groupwise.7x.clients
Author: joea
Date: Sep 22, 2008 13:16

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:54:17 -0400, Gabriel <gabriel_baptist@hotmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism: On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:48:12 -0400, Tim Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid> wrote: : Gabriel wrote: : : Correction: given the belief you ascribe to the evidence. To : those who do not reject God as a possibility, the evidence shows : itself to many times more logically
Show full article (0.60Kb)
On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:48:12 -0400, Tim Miller <replytonewsgroup@invalid.invalid> wrote: : Gabriel wrote: : > : > Correction: given the belief you ascribe to the evidence. To : > those who do not reject God as a possibility, the evidence shows : > itself to many times more logically point to Him, which is the : > point. : > : : There is NO evidence that points to your god OR any other     

Group: alt.talk.creationism · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.talk.creationism
Author: adman
Date: Sep 6, 2008 21:12

On Jun 12, 8:25�pm, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote: Hawk-Eye is not always right 12/6/2008 Ahead of Wimbledon fortnight (23 June to 6 July), researchers from Cardiff School of Social Sciences are advising that sports decision aids such as the Hawk-Eye system should come with a health warning attached. Hawk-Eye, and similar officiating tools which are used to supplement
Show full article (11.24Kb) · Show article thread
In news:vh6fn3tcbimrturb5h56218kbg98nlor85@4ax.com, Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> typed: > On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:07:11 +0100, " ::: good news runner >>> :" <veralein@lycos.com> said the following: > > >> In news:754bn3l87ummcg2vdvc0n8icflrd461udh@4ax.com, >> Pastor Dave <ananias917_@_gmail.com> typed: >> >>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:49:28 +0100, " ::: good news :::" >>> <veralein@lycos     

Group: alt.talk.creationism · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.talk.creationism
Author: Free Lunch
Date: Sep 6, 2008 15:41

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:16:44 -0400, in article <0rci73l1fnj380ug9aekg1g7c96ni2k90o@4ax.com>, Pastor Dave <noway@nowhere.com> wrote: "Have I not seen the Lord?" That was the question that Paul asked of the Corinthians. And of course, it was a rhetorical question. Paul was saying that yes indeed, he had seen the Lord! And so, it makes us wonder, what does it mean to "see
Show full article (10.80Kb) · Show article thread
"Have I not seen the Lord?" That was the question that Paul asked of the Corinthians. And of course, it was a rhetorical question. Paul was saying that yes indeed, he had seen the Lord! And so, it makes us wonder, what does it mean to "see the Lord"? Today, majority opinion seems to think that it means to physically see a physical, human Jesus actually standing in front of them.     

Group: alt.talk.creationism · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.talk.creationism
Author: Gabriel
Date: Sep 6, 2008 13:54

spinoza1111 wrote: lackpurity wrote: Stuff. He is a wise and good person and not a schnook. spinoza1111 wrote: Tom Reedy wrote: "Moyano & Tsuki" <javipoly@ono.com> wrote in message news:FI9fh.38644$MA3.34061@news.ono.com... Well, the thing that really saddens me is that I'm also a student, I´m 17 years old, I constantly see people on
Show full article (8.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.sport.tennis · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in rec.sport.tennis
Author: Paul
Date: Jun 12, 2008 23:18

Show full article (3.60Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.messianic · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.messianic
Author: ::: good news runner :::
Date: Dec 30, 2007 06:57

Show full article (15.10Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.messianic · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.messianic
Author: ®andy
Date: Jun 20, 2007 11:23

Show full article (5.03Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.messianic · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in alt.messianic
Author: Pastor Dave
Date: Jun 20, 2007 07:16

Show full article (5.88Kb)
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for Eyes Have Not Seen in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: lackpurity
Date: Dec 14, 2006 09:17

Show full article (17.69Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next