...know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your : > assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. : > What we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be : > considered "eroticising". : : Oh, come on. You are not that stupid. You are playing games. Rape : is sexual intercourse, ...

...'t know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your : assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. What : we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be considered : "eroticising". : Oh, come on. You are not that stupid. You are playing games. Rape is : sexual intercourse, and sexual ...

...t know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. What we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be considered "eroticising". Oh, come on. You are not that stupid. You are playing games. Rape is sexual intercourse, ...

...'t know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. What we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be considered "eroticising". Oh, come on. You are not that stupid. You are playing games. Rape is sexual intercourse, and sexual...

...'t know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. What we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be considered "eroticising". Oh, come on. You are not that stupid. You are playing games. Rape is sexual intercourse, and sexual ...

... and her pubescent friends? I don't know, and whatever TPM thought in 1966 isn't relevant to your assertion that the rape in Hounddog "eroticises" this young actress. What we're discussing here is how exactly a rape scene can be considered "eroticising". Ian