David Hansen wrote: On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:11:05 +0100 someone who may be Conor <conor_turton@hotmail.com> wrote this:- If they had jobs, they'd be at work, not sat on a train. They could also have taken a holiday. And if they're so passionate about their beliefs, why do they wear masks and hide their faces in photos? The first photograph at <http://www....
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:11:05 +0100 someone who may be Conor <conor_turton@hotmail.com> wrote this:- If they had jobs, they'd be at work, not sat on a train. They could also have taken a holiday. And if they're so passionate about their beliefs, why do they wear masks and hide their faces in photos? The first photograph at <http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/06/401047.html> ...
...>> It is mildly amusing when people trot out this sort of stereotype, as it shows who has no better arguments. If they had jobs, they'd be at work, not sat on a train. And if they're so passionate about their beliefs, why do they wear masks and hide their faces in photos? Perhaps they'd lose their jobs if their bosses recognised them on television? ;-) --...
.... It is mildly amusing when people trot out this sort of stereotype, as it shows who has no better arguments. If they had jobs, they'd be at work, not sat on a train. And if they're so passionate about their beliefs, why do they wear masks and hide their faces in photos? Perhaps they did not want their boss to recognize them after they took a sickie. --...
...> Yawn. It is mildly amusing when people trot out this sort of stereotype, as it shows who has no better arguments. If they had jobs, they'd be at work, not sat on a train. And if they're so passionate about their beliefs, why do they wear masks and hide their faces in photos? -- Conor I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking ...
... Daily Mail, but having a "PhD" is no guarantee of employment, nor that the holder thereof is not a work-shy scrounging bastard. Nor is there any guarantee that the protstors are work-shy dole scroungers. Yawn. Indeed. Maybe so. Perhaps they just take Fridays off to hijack trains, and work for the rest of the week. -- Moving things in still pictures!
...drivers generally sit in the cab at power stations, while the slow speed control system moves the train through the unloading hoppers at the speed the driver has set. I can't remember if the...hours. If necessary/requested they would have arranged for a replacement driver to take over the train, sent by taxi if necessary. All done by railway radio or railway mobile telephone. It is ...
... drivers generally sit in the cab at power stations, while the slow speed control system moves the train through the unloading hoppers at the speed the driver has set. I can't remember if the driver ...'s hours. If necessary/requested they would have arranged for a replacement driver to take over the train, sent by taxi if necessary. All done by railway radio or railway mobile telephone. It is ...
David Hansen wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:46:29 +0100 someone who may be Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote this:- So you agree that they stopped the train, I never claimed otherwise. then why did you post "but sitting in the cab of a stationary locomotive involved no extra danger" That is fairly obvious. When moving along the driver was doing ...
David Hansen wrote: On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:46:29 +0100 someone who may be Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote this:- So you agree that they stopped the train, I never claimed otherwise. then why did you post "but sitting in the cab of a stationary locomotive involved no extra danger" That is fairly obvious. When moving along the driver was doing ...
