On 07/06/2010 03:59, John Lewis wrote: On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:54:42 GMT, "gnomon@al.ia"<gnomon> wrote: On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:02:38 GMT, john.dsl@verizon.net (John Lewis) wrote: See:- http://www.patches-scrolls.de/precursors.php#tp10 Precursors comes from Deep Shadows, the developers of Boiling Point. It is ONLY available in Russian (so far). It is not
On 13 May, 16:28, "Ophelia" <Ophe...@Elsinore.me.uk> wrote: "Basil Jet" <jo...@journeyflow.spamspam.com> wrote in message news:4bec089e$0$2524$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk... On 13/05/2010 14:11, Robert Henderson wrote: Scottish pilot loses racism claim over 'Jock' insults of his British Airways colleagues He sued BA for racial victimisation after he was allegedly
On 2010-05-13 22:00:21 -0400, Pascal J. Bourguignon said: That is, ontologically, is it possible to have an action without a subject? Ontologically, a buddhist would say that it is not possible to have an action *with* a subject. i.e., the supposed subject is an arbitrary delineation within a completely interconnected continuum of phenomena: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra's_net>
On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:06:05 -0700, Reinhold {Rey} Aman <aman@sonic.net> wrote: [Added back <alt.usage.english>] Stan Brown wrote: (followups to alt.usenet.offline-reader only) Why? This thread ("Elements of Style in English") is certainly more interesting than most of the crap in AUE nowadays, particularly all that endless fuckin' "Céline" shit and that long idiotic "Happy
