<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <atom:link rel="search"
    href="http://www.nnseek.com/nnseek_com_os_descr.xml"
    type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
    title="Search in newsgroups" />
  <title>Search result for Energyless</title>
  <link>http://www.nnseek.com/Energyless_s.html</link>
  <description>Search results for Energyless</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:30:16 PST</lastBuildDate>
  

  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: Energy...What is it?]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/energy_what_is_it_101090048m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/energy_what_is_it_101090048m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... they are calling "good energy" is   in fact what scientists refer to as "energy". They are not the same   albeit they are related.    I think that the relation is because and "<b>energyless</b>" particle would   not interact with any instruments and so physically would not exist.   So I think the idea of energy becomes confused with the idea of   material existence which then becomes further equivocated...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/">alt.philosophy</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/energy_what_is_it_100506112t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/energy_what_is_it_101090048m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:30:16 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>