RayLopez99 wrote: On Jun 7, 11:57 pm, David Brown <david.br...@hesbynett.removethisbit.no> wrote: We already knew you were masochistic in your determination to use such out-of-date equipment, but I didn't know you were so sadistic that you are trying to impose it on someone else. If this other person wants a usable computer, can't you or they just buy something from this century
RayLopez99 wrote: On Jun 7, 8:58 pm, David Brown <david.br...@hesbynett.removethisbit.no> wrote: Whatever. Most people use Windows. What's that got to do with anything? It's not related to the operating system. It's about having appropriate hardware, and following the basic instructions for it. In reality, setting up a simple network, like you are trying to do
In article <hu0ocg614hb@news2.newsguy.com>, Michael Coburn <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote: On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:59:39 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: "Michael Coburn" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message news:hu0lc7514hb@news2.newsguy.com... On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:06:21 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: Get government to steal?! Government does that best
On Mon, 31 May 2010 10:59:42 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: "Michael Coburn" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message news:hu0ocg614hb@news2.newsguy.com... On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:59:39 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote: "Michael Coburn" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message news:hu0lc7514hb@news2.newsguy.com... On Mon, 31 May 2010 08:06:21 -0700, Jeff Strickland wrote:
kapjim@example.com wrote: For several years I saw almost zero spam get through to my mail client, and also none in my spam folder on Comcast server. I assume they were using a heavy handed approach - my daily portfolio update from Ameritrade even stopped getting through. In the last few months I am seeing usually 3-5 spam messages a day, mostly flagged as such by Norton, but
