On Jun 8, 6:30 am, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nka...@gmail.com> wrote: He went screwing around with the telephone port "modem" settings and connections, confused by the name "DSL modem". No. You keep saying that, and I let you continue, but let me now set you straight. That's NOT what happened. YOU, not I, are confused. I said "modem for DSL" meaning "Damn Small Linux". Not ADSL. My bad
On Jun 7, 10:41 am, The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote: Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Jun 7, 6:31 am, The Natural Philosopher <t...@invalid.invalid> wrote: RayLopez99 wrote: On Jun 7, 9:40 am, Nigel Feltham <nigel.felt...@btinternet.com> wrote: Peter wrote: In article <6f185f76-27a3-4db0-8c21- 106dd69b7...@j8g2000yqd.googlegroups
Peter wrote: In article <huibv9$hu2$2@news.eternal-september.org>, hadronquark@gmail.com says... Peter <pete.ivesAll_stRESS@blueyonder.co.uk> writes: In article <6f185f76-27a3-4db0-8c21- 106dd69b7130@j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, raylopez88@gmail.com says... Stupid question #2: if I go with the D-Link, I just power it up, plug the speedtouch DSL modem into the "WAN"
On Jun 7, 11:28 pm, Peter <pete.ivesAll_stR...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote: Router's do not replace modems. Unless it's a dsl modem/router combo product. Isn't that what he has? A DSL modem. Which in my book is replaced by an ADSL modem/router. Which I thought the D-Link was. And if it isn't, then it's no good to him. Yes, that's right. But Peter Ives I've elected to try the
In article <huibv9$hu2$2@news.eternal-september.org>, hadronquark@gmail.com says... Peter <pete.ivesAll_stRESS@blueyonder.co.uk> writes: In article <6f185f76-27a3-4db0-8c21- 106dd69b7130@j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, raylopez88@gmail.com says... Stupid question #2: if I go with the D-Link, I just power it up, plug the speedtouch DSL modem into the "WAN" port as
