I'm grateful for that (on the dialogue), Ian. Alex has the opposite view, to which she's entitled, but I think I maybe know why. We Brits are emotional, and kitchen sink is the nature of our discourse. To our detriment, I think. Even the worst emotional crisis is dealt with in a dour, understated manner. In a US movie pots are thrown, maybe even guns are drawn. But it's part
Troia <troia.legata@gmail.removethiscom> wrote: Buddy Butt wrote: huey.callison@gmail.com wrote: Atlanta sees herself as a gifted communicator, but admits that no one understands her. How can this be? Simple: all of you people are INSISTING on misunderstanding her. You're doing it on purpose! It couldn't POSSIBLY be that she's actually a terrible communicator,
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:49:35 +0100, Graham Drabble <usenet05@drabble.me.uk> wrote: It may not stop them initially but it makes life a lot easier for those that are challenging them. Otherwise you get the position where people declare that there are rules "because I say so". If all local rules needed written approval from HQ then it becomes easy The trouble is, what's a rule? I might
On 23 Oct 2007 "chris.5th" <chris.5th@gmail.com> wrote in news:1193170842.564141.275140@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com: On 23 Oct, 19:49, Graham Drabble <usene...@drabble.me.uk> wrote: On 22 Oct 2007 bulp...@cwgsy.net wrote innews:1193087104.921548.174410@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com: You and I know that changing POR won't in itself make any difference, far better to address
On 22 Oct 2007 bulpitt@cwgsy.net wrote in news:1193087104.921548.174410@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com: You and I know that changing POR won't in itself make any difference, far better to address the individuals responsible for them as suggested. It may not stop them initially but it makes life a lot easier for those that are challenging them. Otherwise you get the position where people
