owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU wrote on 07/31/2008 03:06:08 PM: ... the file I am uploading is an AWS tape format ... If you have the vtape server available on the network (or your pc), you can easily copy the AWS file to a real tape as follows: // JOB INSTALL COPY VTAPE TO TAPE // UPSI 1 // VTAPE START,UNIT=F80,LOC=10.1.12.118,READ, FILE='C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\DLCLARK\DLCPUB\'

Received: from [91.134.7.30] by openbrick.kicks-ass.net (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.6.0)); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:22:04 -0400 Received: from [91.134.7.30] by dlclarke.com; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:22:01 +0200 Message-ID: <01c8db85$d3c38a80$1e07865b@andydo> From: "Natalie Elam" <andydo@dlclarke.com> To: <[removed]> Subject: Haben Sie wieder Spass am Leben! Date: Tue

I'm wondering if I have my MRO Link security set up incorrectly. We are just beginning to design an internal application security system which uses the BSM to manage all of the security for internal application resources. I wrote an application to manage the BSTCNTL file entries for our application resources (because using the IUI dialog is clunky and deficient in features) and am securing

owner-vse-l@Lehigh.EDU wrote on 01/15/2008 08:14:38 AM: What would be that setting in BSM? We are running CICS/TS and VSE 2.6.1. I used to start tcAccess from sequential terminal entries when I was running it under CICS/VSE. I changed to using the PLT when I moved tcAccess to CICS/TS. All of my TCAS transactions run under CICSUSER (see screen shot) -- but I have XUSER=NO in my SIT

Before I run this up the IBM flagpole, I thought I'd ask the list -- to see if there is something I don't understand correctly. I'm investigating how to use the BSM to protect internal application resources at the user id level. So, I used the IUI dialogs (Fastpath: 2819) to create a FACILITY resource id: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ IESADMBSLE