Displaycode
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 55 articles for 0.304 sec
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:53:41 -0700, Denny Wheeler <dennyw@TANSTAAFL.zipcon.net.INVALID> wrote: >On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:03:42 GMT, firstname@lastname.net (Mike >Andruschak) wrote: > >>Please cite the legal code that states a given party has the right of >>way. >> >>http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=veh&group=21001-22000&file=21800-21809 >> >>The language used throughout     

Group: alt.callahans · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in alt.callahans
Author: Mike Andruschak
Date: Aug 6, 2008 06:42

Mike Andruschak wrote: On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:56:27 -0600, D.J. <solosam75@cableone.net> wrote: On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:10:07 GMT, firstname@lastname.net (Mike Andruschak) wrote: ]ERROR!!! You did NOT have the right of way. Check the law. There ]is NOTHING in the law that ever states that a person has the right of ]way. What the law states is that certain people are
Show full article (0.88Kb) · Show article thread
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:03:42 GMT, firstname@lastname.net (Mike Andruschak) wrote: >Please cite the legal code that states a given party has the right of >way. > >http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=veh&group=21001-22000&file=21800-21809 > >The language used throughout is "The driver of a vehicle ... shall >yield the right-of-way to..." Please inform us what school     

Group: alt.callahans · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in alt.callahans
Author: Ree
Date: Aug 5, 2008 21:27

On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:56:27 -0600, D.J. <solosam75@cableone.net> wrote: On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:10:07 GMT, firstname@lastname.net (Mike Andruschak) wrote: ]ERROR!!! You did NOT have the right of way. Check the law. There ]is NOTHING in the law that ever states that a person has the right of ]way. What the law states is that certain people are supposed to yield ]the right of way
Show full article (1.26Kb) · Show article thread
On 2008-06-12, Nate Nagel <njnagel@roosters.net> wrote: > Scott in SoCal wrote: >> Even the cops don't understand what "Slower Traffic Keep Right" means. >> >> http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93078 >> >> In CA, the lanes are designated as such: Left lane for faster moving >> traffic not exceeding the maximum limit for the highway. All other >> lanes are for slower moving     

Group: alt.callahans · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in alt.callahans
Author: Denny Wheeler
Date: Aug 5, 2008 20:53

On 2008-06-12, Nate Nagel <njnagel@roosters.net> wrote: Scott in SoCal wrote: Even the cops don't understand what "Slower Traffic Keep Right" means. http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93078 In CA, the lanes are designated as such: Left lane for faster moving traffic not exceeding the maximum limit for the highway. All other lanes are for slower moving
Show full article (0.58Kb) · Show article thread
Scott in SoCal wrote: > Even the cops don't understand what "Slower Traffic Keep Right" means. > > http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93078 > > In CA, the lanes are designated as such: Left lane for faster moving > traffic not exceeding the maximum limit for the highway. All other > lanes are for slower moving traffic with the slowest lane being the > extreme right hand lane     

Group: alt.callahans · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in alt.callahans
Author: Mike Andruschak
Date: Aug 5, 2008 13:03

Scott in SoCal wrote: Even the cops don't understand what "Slower Traffic Keep Right" means. http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=93078 In CA, the lanes are designated as such: Left lane for faster moving traffic not exceeding the maximum limit for the highway. All other lanes are for slower moving traffic with the slowest lane being the extreme right hand lane
Show full article (1.02Kb) · Show article thread
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote: >Well, when I was a kid, my parents spanked me when they felt I needed it. >Somebody somewhere at sometime challenged a parent's right ot spank, the >court ruled that spanking was intolerable and the legislature created a law >to codeify the ruling. Actually, as in the section I cited in another post tonight, in CA the legislature explicitly said     

Group: ca.driving · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in ca.driving
Author: Brent P
Date: Jun 11, 2008 19:50

On Dec 19, 4:48 pm, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote: In article <e573e140-0434-4748-a342-82e968259...@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Buteo.linea...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 19, 10:51?am, tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com (aka "Idiot") wrote: Hey dumbass, I don't know who told you that bullshit, but limited access highways began in Germany in the 1930s
Show full article (2.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.autos.driving · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in rec.autos.driving
Author: Brent P
Date: Jun 11, 2008 19:50

Show full article (2.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: ca.driving · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in ca.driving
Author: Nate Nagel
Date: Jun 11, 2008 19:33

Show full article (2.07Kb)
    

Group: rec.autos.driving · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in rec.autos.driving
Author: Nate Nagel
Date: Jun 11, 2008 19:33

Show full article (2.07Kb)
    

Group: alt.politics.usa.constitution · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in alt.politics.usa.constitution
Author: Bob LeChevalier
Date: Mar 20, 2008 22:27

Show full article (4.85Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.autos.driving · Group Profile · Search for Displaycode in rec.autos.driving
Author: donquijote1954
Date: Dec 20, 2007 08:43

Show full article (6.43Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · next