Prefer OEM Dell - complete for Dimenion machines would be excellent Need COA and software. Reply valid but remove MAPS Thanks David

...:01 am, zinnic <zeenr...@gate.net> wrote:  explain why the brain/mind interprets a two-dimensional circle shaded in its upper or lower hemisphere as being three-dimenionally concave or convex, respectively. Your question implies thats a problem of philosophy, and reality, its not. Its mind dependent garbage. My philosophy is underpinned by the epistemology of ...

... Feb 8, 7:01 am, zinnic <zeenr...@gate.net> wrote: explain why the brain/mind interprets a two-dimensional circle shaded in its upper or lower hemisphere as being three-dimenionally concave or convex, respectively. Your question implies thats a problem of philosophy, and reality, its not. Its mind dependent garbage. My philosophy is underpinned by the epistemology of reason, ...

... of triangles, color or sunshine in my post. Since you mentioned , sunshine explain why the brain/mind interprets a two-dimensional circle shaded in its upper or lower hemisphere as being three-dimenionally concave or convex, respectively. HINT: mindless eyes do not see! The different images are two different brain/mind interpretations of the same thing, are they not? NO, ...

... spend time developing their wrong foot. Having said all that, it's an easy game when you're watching. Different when you're out there. I thought our main problem was the attack was one dimenional really. Pennant was the only one doing some damage down the right but his crossing was not accurate enough. Having said, you need to have Beckham-like ability to pick out the 1 or 2...

...Benitez brought him back but never gave him as much of a chance as he should have. Sign him for Rangers I say. I thought our main problem was the attack was one dimenional really. Pennant was the only one doing some damage down the right but his crossing was not accurate enough. Having said, you need to have Beckham-like ability to pick out the 1 or 2 red...

...dimensions occurs because the fourth dimension is expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions. The simple proof is as follows: The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimenion is to translate with a velocity c through the three spatial dimensions. The only way to stay staionary in the three spatial dimensions is to translate with a velocity c through the ...

... dimensions. The simple proof is as follows: The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimenion is to translate with a velocity c through the three spatial dimensions. The only way to stay .... Ergo the fourth dimension is expanding at the rate of c relative to the three spatial dimenions." How sad it is that when truth stares modern physicists in the face, they must close their ...

... stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at the speed of light through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is expanding at the rate of c relative to the three spatial dimenions." How sad it is that when truth stares modern physicists in the face, they must close their eyes so as to get a postdoc or raise more funds for String Theory. Moving Dimensions Theory is...

... if (size(imat,1) /= size(x,1) .or. size(imat,2) /= size(x,2) .or. size(x,1) /= size(z,1) .or. size(x,2) /= size(z,2)) then stop "unexpected dimenions in foo" end if ! some code end subroutine foo I recommended this about two years ago (as part of a discussion on generic programming). Except note that the bounds that must conform are not always the same. Consider if IMAT, ...