On 20 Dec 2006 11:58:44 -0800, Patrick1765@aol.com wrote: Michael Schey wrote: Nothing wrong with the list. It's the source of the list that I question. Why ? Because you question their political and news coverage, their entertainment writers are questionable too ? How about their sports writers, are they questionable ? Sensationalist journalism.....
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:32:44 +0100, "Robert Neugarten" <r.neugarten@planet.nl> wrote: "Michael Schey" <mscheynjSPAMBLOCK@yahoo.com> schreef in bericht news:b12jo2tbfvn1lajqs8j2dfcq6u45hidlpb@4ax.com... Consider the source (not Patrick in this case, but the source of the list). The NY Post? Give me a break. Robin Williams once mentioned the NYP in one of his skits, saying
Consider the source (not Patrick in this case, but the source of the list). The NY Post? Give me a break. Robin Williams once mentioned the NYP in one of his skits, saying he used the paper on the bottom of a bird-cage and the parrot kept on saying "Redundant, redundant". On 20 Dec 2006 10:07:59 -0800, Patrick1765@aol.com wrote: nypost.com December 19, 2006 -- Pick your favorite
"Paul Hyett" <vidcapper@invalid83261.co.uk> wrote in message news:LER+q7GcjdCHFwH6@blueyonder.co.uk... In uk.music.charts on Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Chris Brown <extremespamrice@yahoo.com> wrote : Singles ------- Sugababes greatly consolidate their hold on the #1 position, thanks to the CD release. Of course, one disadvantage of a single topping the charts on
