Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 3 articles for 0.027 sec
Fwd: Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms     

Group: gnu.emacs.sources · Group Profile · Search for Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms in gnu.emacs.sources
Author: Dan Nicolaescu
Date: Dec 1, 2007 00:03

...<rms@gnu.org> Subject: Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms In ... because we think they are obsolete and not useful. If you ...please send an explanation to emacs-obsolete-poll@gnu.org. We...try to keep the support for platforms that people actually want...m/delta88k.h) -- gcc dropped support for 88k a while ago...m/i860.h) gcc dropped support a while ago ibm ps...
Show full article (2.98Kb)
Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms     

Group: gnu.emacs.help · Group Profile · Search for Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms in gnu.emacs.help
Author: Richard Stallman
Date: Nov 21, 2007 04:04

... we are thinking of deleting Emacs support for the systems and ... because we think they are obsolete and not useful. If you ... of those platforms, please send an explanation to emacs-obsolete-poll@... try to keep the support for platforms that people actually want...m/delta88k.h) -- gcc dropped support for 88k a while ago...m/i860.h) gcc dropped support a while ago ibm ps...
Show full article (2.81Kb)
Re: Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms     

Group: gnu.emacs.help · Group Profile · Search for Deleting Emacs support for obsolete platforms in gnu.emacs.help
Author: Peter Dyballa
Date: Dec 16, 2007 15:02

...um 19:23 schrieb David Combs: Maybe there's still some sun3's still around? In someone's basement? Could a Sun-3 or Apollo Domain at less than 20 MHz deliver enough CPU power for GNU Emacs 23.0.50 or 23.0.60? I'd think 25 MHz is minimum ... -- Greetings Pete The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found...
Show full article (0.46Kb) · Show article thread