<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <atom:link rel="search"
    href="http://www.nnseek.com/nnseek_com_os_descr.xml"
    type="application/opensearchdescription+xml"
    title="Search in newsgroups" />
  <title>Search result for Debating Libertarianism</title>
  <link>http://www.nnseek.com/Debating-Libertarianism_s.html</link>
  <description>Search results for Debating Libertarianism</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:09:26 PST</lastBuildDate>
  

  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: CNN Republican Candidate Debate 01-30-08 (AKA "The Mic & Romney Puppet Show")]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328356609m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328356609m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[...party. The only time I get to see anything on, say, the   <b>Libertarian</b> Party, is every 4 years when their convention comes up to   nominate the presidential candidate and then again at the third party   <b>debate</b> (provided they have it). Both on one of the two <a href="http://C-SPAN...cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">C-SPAN...cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop</a>-<b>debate</b>/  Pathetic.  Shame on you, CNN.  <br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/">alt.startrek</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328200961t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328356609m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:09:26 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: CNN Republican Candidate Debate 01-30-08 (AKA "The Mic & Romney Puppet Show")]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328355841m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328355841m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... party. The only time I get to see anything on, say, the   <b>Libertarian</b> Party, is every 4 years when their convention comes up to   nominate the presidential candidate and then again at the third party   <b>debate</b> (provided they have it). Both on one of the two C-SPAN ....<a href="http://cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop</a>-<b>debate</b>/  Pathetic.  Shame on you, CNN.  <br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/">alt.startrek</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328200961t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328355841m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:04:37 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: CNN Republican Candidate Debate 01-30-08 (AKA "The Mic & Romney Puppet Show")]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328229377m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328229377m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[...Droog party. The only time I get to see anything on, say, the   <b>Libertarian</b> Party, is every 4 years when their convention comes up to   nominate the presidential candidate and then again at the third party <b>debate</b>   (provided they have it). Both on one of the two C-SPAN <a href="http://networks...blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">networks...blogs.cnn.com/2008/01/30/what-do-you-think-of-tonights-gop</a>-<b>debate</b>/  Pathetic.  Shame on you, CNN.  <br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/">alt.startrek</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328200961t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.startrek/cnn_republican_candidate_debate_01_30_08_aka_the_mic_328229377m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:23:45 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: ABC & Fox Exclude So-Called Minor Candidates For Debates]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159720704m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159720704m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[On Jan 5, 1:31 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@<a href="http://aol.com" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">aol.com</a>> wrote:  Reportedly, Dr Paul, <b>libertarian</b>, is going to be in the ABC <b>debate</b> on  Monday.  YAY!  I LOVE liberdopes in public <b>debates</b>.  First they keep the <b>debate</b> on economic matters.  Second they make right wing economics more unpopular.  Bret Cahill    The ABC <b>debate</b> ended a few minutes ago.<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/">alt.philosophy</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159628288t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159720704m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:54:04 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: ABC & Fox Exclude So-Called Minor Candidates For Debates]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159662848m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159662848m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[> Reportedly, Dr Paul, <b>libertarian</b>, is going to be in the ABC <b>debate</b> on  Monday.    YAY!  I LOVE liberdopes in public <b>debates</b>.    First they keep the <b>debate</b> on economic matters.    Second they make right wing economics more unpopular.      Bret Cahill    <br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/">alt.philosophy</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159628288t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159662848m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 10:31:50 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: ABC & Fox Exclude So-Called Minor Candidates For Debates]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159655680m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159655680m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[...and there are precedents in U.S.  Presidential <b>debates</b> in the past.  The Ron Pauls and Dennis...>  I usually don't watch the  <b>debates</b>, because they are often sing-song.  ... to make 'em more interesting & dynamic "real  <b>debates</b>" rather than recitations ad nauseam of platforms..../article/20080104/D8TVC2S00.html    Reportedly, Dr Paul, <b>libertarian</b>, is going to be in the ABC <b>debate</b> on  Monday.<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/">alt.philosophy</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159628288t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/alt.philosophy/abc_fox_exclude_so_called_minor_candidates_for_deb_159655680m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:11:24 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[I Do NOT Post So Middle Boys Can Debate]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hmong/i_do_not_post_so_middle_boys_can_debate_94455554m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hmong/i_do_not_post_so_middle_boys_can_debate_94455554m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... me.....    What I am interested in is:    Whether or not the "multi-ethnic Laotians" ---- be they democrats,  republicans, communists, socialists, atheists, Buddhists, Hindus,  Muslims, animists, <b>Libertarians</b>, Liberals, Conservatives, drunk,  sobers ---- ARE CAPABLE of promulgating a NATIONAL CONSTITUTION in  WHOSE DOMAIN and juristiction you can put a man as stupid as George W.  Bush in charge ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hmong/">soc.culture.hmong</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hmong/i_do_not_post_so_middle_boys_can_debate_94455554t.html"><b>4</b> Comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hmong/i_do_not_post_so_middle_boys_can_debate_94455554m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:09:39 PST</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[For Criticism of China's Environment Calamities, Is Wen Jiabao an anti-Chinese racist too? -- China's environment sparks new debate/Richard Spencer]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hongkong/for_criticism_of_china_s_environment_calamities_is_94502916m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hongkong/for_criticism_of_china_s_environment_calamities_is_94502916m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[...  anti-Chinese racist too? -- China's environment sparks new  <b>debate</b>/Richard Spencer    China's environment sparks new <b>debate</b>    <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/richardspencer/july2007/newdebate.htm" rel="nofollow" class="url" target="_blank">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/foreign/richardspencer/july2007/newdebate.htm</a>    Posted by Richard Spencer ..., with the twist that  many of them have transmuted into <b>Libertarian</b> theorists who seem to have  more in common with the ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hongkong/">soc.culture.hongkong</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hongkong/for_criticism_of_china_s_environment_calamities_is_94502916t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/soc.culture.hongkong/for_criticism_of_china_s_environment_calamities_is_94502916m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:33:48 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[Re: The American right is a cauldron of debate; the left isn't.]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86765828m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86765828m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... to both, and  the small government, <b>libertarian</b> wing supporting both. No such major...alteration of the Constitution to advance <b>debatable</b> social policy,  preferring that states function...within contemporary American conservatism--social conservatives,  <b>libertarians</b>, and neoconservatives--arise from differences ... conservative.  Famously, at least in <b>libertarian</b> circles, Hayek, an Austrian-born  ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/">mn.politics</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86678276t.html">no comments</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86765828m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:14:46 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title><![CDATA[The American right is a cauldron of debate; the left isn't.]]></title>
    <guid>http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86678276m.html</guid>
    <link>http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86678276m.html</link>
    <description><![CDATA[... to both, and  the small government, <b>libertarian</b> wing supporting both. No such major  ...alteration of the Constitution to advance <b>debatable</b> social policy,  preferring that states function...within contemporary American conservatism--social conservatives,  <b>libertarians</b>, and neoconservatives--arise from differences over... conservative.    Famously, at least in <b>libertarian</b> circles, Hayek, an Austrian-born  ...<br><br>
    <table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td width="30">&nbsp;</td>
        <td>Posted In: <a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/">mn.politics</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86678276t.html"><b>1</b> Comment</a></td>
        <td width="20">&nbsp;</td>
        <td><a href="http://www.nnseek.com/e/mn.politics/the_american_right_is_a_cauldron_of_debate_the_left_86678276m.html">Reply</a></td>
      </tr></table>]]></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 05:11:39 PDT</pubDate>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>