The Scientific Method and Global Warming Hugo F. Franzen 1216 Scott Ave. Ames, IA. 50014 One defining characteristic of humans is their ability and propensity to “make sense of things.” Confronted with an aspect of nature or society that might have an explanation, i.e. a discernible reason for its occurrence, humans inevitably strive to provide such an explanation. This is the basis of
Tina MayIAsk, yes, you may. Tina MayIAsk how you got a result saying with a 95%%+ confidence level that url A is better than url B? I would assume that whoever analyzed the results pooled the test results over 14 days, amassing a relatively large sample, and conducted a statistical test for the significance of observed differences in means of response rates. The larger a random sample from
Ben Holmes wrote: In article <1193514562.398476.160410@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, aeffects says... On Oct 27, 11:59 am, Bud <sirsl...@fast.net> wrote: Ben Holmes wrote: In article <1193470586.622620.106...@v23g2000prn.googlegroups.com>, aeffects says... On Oct 27, 12:04 am, chuck schuyler <chu...@am-mtg.com> wrote: You're probably a Lone
Spartanicus wrote: Toby Inkster wrote: Lack of DOCTYPE The first line of an HTML5 document must be: <!DOCTYPE The lack of a full DOCTYPE with a URL would make SGML validation of the document impossible, and would make it impossible for a user agent to guess what version of HTML the document is written in. This is a step towards a world of tag soup.
Ten of the Best Climate Research Papers (Nine Peer-Reviewed) A Note from Cohenite September 10 2008. The accusation of a lack of peer review (PR) by those who mount arguments against anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is at the heart of the elitism, consensus and ad hominem approach used by many supporters of AGW. It is a red herring. Science should be like the Law
