I certainly understand your position on this. But, I will say that upsizing to SQL Server is less often a good idea that the times it is done. There are really only two times it is worthy of consideration. 1. The volume of data exceeds the 2GB limit for an Access mdb back end. 2. The data is very sensitive and ULS is not deemed enough security. For the second reason, there is very little
On Feb 20, 7:38 pm, sc...@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: "els...@gmail.com" <els...@gmail.com> writes: On Feb 20, 6:55 pm, Dave <papaw_geo...@verizon.net> wrote: On Feb 20, 7:29 pm, sc...@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: Please stop with your off-topic political crap. scott I agree with Scott. if you want to talk politics, go to a politics blog
Ron Ruff wrote: Java Man Espressopithecus wrote: One point Tom has edged up to, but not yet made, is that the USA is NOT a free market -- it is a regulated market. And the laws and regulations have a significant effect on what gets done as well as what doesn't. The American aversion to socialized medicine, for example, costs American businesses a fortune and leaves many
>> La Mouse <lynnekosit...@gmail.com> wrote: Art can write perfectly sensible posts, and he does so every now and then. If he can do that on Arden, he'll be welcome. . art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote: And what is the point of writing perfectly sensible posts if they are either ignored or (worse) if they are misinterpreted and someone goes off whining like a prissy little
