Count3
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 44 articles for 0.304 sec
I'll Always Be Here wrote: > ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> wrote in news:g9q2s8$cbn$1@aioe.org: > > >>Michael Ejercito wrote: >> ... >>> The evidence was in the Nazis' own documents as well as the >>>transcripts of the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg. >>> >> >>We already know, always "eyewitnesses" or "confessions" >> >> And what do they testify EXACTLY? >> >>Have they     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: Sep 8, 2008 14:19

On Jul 26, 3:44 pm, ZULU <z...@freetibet.cn> wrote: Joe Bruno wrote: On Jul 26, 1:53 pm, ZULU <z...@freetibet.cn> wrote: According with Shean Penn, that includes George Tenet, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice and G W Bush. He just forgot Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell and some others neo-cons responsible for lies which deceived large part of civilized Nations and caused the
Show full article (7.25Kb) · Show article thread
Joe Bruno wrote: > On Jul 26, 1:53 pm, ZULU <z...@freetibet.cn> wrote: > >>According with Shean Penn, that includes George Tenet, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice >>and G W Bush. >>He just forgot Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell and some others neo-cons responsible for lies >>which deceived large part of civilized Nations and caused the death of thousands of >>innocent victims. >> >>Something     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: Joe Bruno
Date: Jul 27, 2008 09:06

Matthias Kern wrote: ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: Matthias Kern wrote: ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: Oh YES? And which is the counting point? The reason given to justify that the nazis were nor considered guilty for Katyn at Nuremberg is that Katyn is nor mentioned in the final judgment. Yes, none has judge german
Show full article (2.56Kb) · Show article thread
Matthias Kern wrote: > ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: > > >>Matthias Kern wrote: >> >> >>>ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: >>> >>> >>>>Oh YES? And which is the counting point? >>>> >>>>The reason given to justify that the nazis were nor considered >>>>guilty for Katyn at Nuremberg is that Katyn is nor mentioned in the >>>>final judgment. >>>> >>> >>>Yes, none has judge german     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: Jul 26, 2008 15:44

Matthias Kern wrote: ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: RJ11 wrote: In article <fvaudf$86o$1@aioe.org>, ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> wrote: RJ11 wrote: Are you sure, lulu? Majdanek for example is mentioned, although it's spelled "Maydanek". Sobibor is mentioned and so is Belzec (spelled "Belsec"). NOPE. Show us the passages
Show full article (2.27Kb) · Show article thread
Matthias Kern wrote: > ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> schrieb: > > >>RJ11 wrote: >> >> >>>In article <fvaudf$86o$1@aioe.org>, ZULU <zulu@freetibet.cn> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>RJ11 wrote: >>> >>>>> Are you sure, lulu? Majdanek for example is mentioned, >>>>>although it's spelled "Maydanek". Sobibor is mentioned and so >>>>>is Belzec (spelled "Belsec"). >>> >>>>NOPE. >>>>Show us the passages     

Group: de.soc.politik.misc · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in de.soc.politik.misc
Author: ZULU
Date: May 5, 2008 08:10

Philip Mathews wrote: On Apr 13, 10:06 am, ZULU <z...@koolah.es> wrote: Philip Mathews wrote: On Apr 6, 6:36 am, ZULU <z...@koolah.es> wrote: RJ11 wrote: In article <ft654i$qh...@aioe.org>, ZULU <z...@koolah.es> wrote: (snip a truly lame attempt at diversion) Just deal with the evidence, lulu. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1673471
Show full article (0.88Kb) · Show article thread
Kenneth McVay OBC wrote: > > In article <47E6C94F.9BD617BE@autokar.com>, ZULU <zulu@autokar.com> wrote: > > > > > >Sayanim wrote: > > > >> However you like to put it, Sara, the "trials" were a farce. The > >> "defendants" had been pre-judged and it was a forgone conclusion who would > >> be executed. > >> > >> The defendants were essentially undefended. There was little if any >     

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: May 5, 2008 08:10

On 17 Mar, 09:28, Matthew Huntbach <m...@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> wrote: The first line "Count1" gives the votes cast for all candidates. In this election, instead of the candidate with the most votes automatically winning, a candidate has to get over half the votes. So what happens is that the candidates with the lowest votes are eliminated, and their votes go ro the next preference
Show full article (0.88Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: de.soc.politik.misc · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in de.soc.politik.misc
Author: ZULU
Date: May 1, 2008 21:28

Show full article (3.99Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: May 1, 2008 21:28

Show full article (3.99Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: Apr 15, 2008 09:35

Show full article (9.29Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in alt.revisionism
Author: ZULU
Date: Mar 24, 2008 16:27

Show full article (4.92Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: uk.politics.electoral · Group Profile · Search for Count3 in uk.politics.electoral
Author: JohnLoony
Date: Mar 17, 2008 05:57

Show full article (3.23Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next