Continuous Random Variable
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 1778 articles for 0.609 sec
On Jul 29, 5:29 pm, simon <Simon.SCh....@gmail.com> wrote: > > breaks down. The approximation (**) for the integral holds for > > functions > > that are 'smooth' in a certain sense, but there are probability > > distributions for which it does not hold. In fact there are > > distributions G > > for which > > > \int_{-a}^{a} dz G(x - z) = Chi_{a}(x) , > > Thanks. If \int_{-a}^{a} dz G(x -     

Group: alt.sci.math.probability · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in alt.sci.math.probability
Author: illywhacker
Date: Jul 29, 2008 09:03

breaks down. The approximation (**) for the integral holds for functions that are 'smooth' in a certain sense, but there are probability distributions for which it does not hold. In fact there are distributions G for which \int_{-a}^{a} dz G(x - z) = Chi_{a}(x) , Thanks. If \int_{-a}^{a} dz G(x - z) = Chi_{a}(x), then x must not be a continuous random variable, but a
Show full article (1.26Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 29, 10:42 am, simon <Simon.SCh....@gmail.com> wrote: > Suppose X and Y are two continuous, independently and identically > distributed random variables. For example, both of them are in > standard normal distribution N(0,1). What is the probability of > equality between X and Y, Pr(X=Y)? Is it infinitesimal? but in the > following way I find Pr(X=Y)=1/(2*sqrt(Pi)): > > Let INT denote     

Group: alt.sci.math.probability · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in alt.sci.math.probability
Author: simon
Date: Jul 29, 2008 08:29

Suppose X and Y are two continuous, independently and identically distributed random variables. For example, both of them are in standard normal distribution N(0,1). What is the probability of equality between X and Y, Pr(X=Y)? Is it infinitesimal? but in the following way I find Pr(X=Y)=1/(2*sqrt(Pi)): Let INT denote an integral from minus infinity to plus infinity, then Pr(X=Y)=INT( Pr(X
Show full article (0.47Kb) · Show article thread
Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor.this.should.not.be.used@nexgo.REMOVETHIS.de> writes: > Randy Yates wrote: >> I recently examined the feasibility of generating noise for testing a >> communication system and came to the disappointing conclusion that >> generating a digital signal and then converting it to analog via an ADC >> will never be capable of generating a stationary, continuous     

Group: alt.flame.cincinnati · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in alt.flame.cincinnati
Author: LEROY KNEVIL
Date: Mar 9, 2008 14:23

Hi John, John O'Flaherty <quiasmox@yeeha.com> writes: On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:13:38 -0400, Randy Yates <yates@ieee.org> wrote: I recently examined the feasibility of generating noise for testing a communication system and came to the disappointing conclusion that generating a digital signal and then converting it to analog via an ADC will never be capable of generating a stationary
Show full article (0.37Kb)
Randy Yates wrote: > I recently examined the feasibility of generating noise for testing a > communication system and came to the disappointing conclusion that > generating a digital signal and then converting it to analog via an ADC > will never be capable of generating a stationary, continuous random > process (signal) with an arbitrary distribution. Uhm, I think you're mixing up sample     

Group: alt.sci.math.probability · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in alt.sci.math.probability
Author: illywhacker
Date: Jul 29, 2008 06:01

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:13:38 -0400, Randy Yates <yates@ieee.org> wrote: I recently examined the feasibility of generating noise for testing a communication system and came to the disappointing conclusion that generating a digital signal and then converting it to analog via an ADC will never be capable of generating a stationary, continuous random process (signal) with an arbitrary distribution
Show full article (2.99Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:50:16 -0700, dbd wrote: > On Apr 18, 7:13 pm, Randy Yates <ya...@ieee.org> wrote: >> I recently examined the feasibility of generating noise for testing a >> communication system and came to the disappointing conclusion that >> generating a digital signal and then converting it to analog via an ADC >> will never be capable of generating a stationary, continuous random     

Group: alt.sci.math.probability · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in alt.sci.math.probability
Author: simon
Date: Jul 29, 2008 01:42

Show full article (0.53Kb)
    

Group: comp.dsp · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in comp.dsp
Author: Randy Yates
Date: Apr 19, 2008 09:41

Show full article (1.22Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.dsp · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in comp.dsp
Author: Randy Yates
Date: Apr 19, 2008 09:19

Show full article (1.88Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.dsp · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in comp.dsp
Author: Piergiorgio Sartor
Date: Apr 19, 2008 09:16

Show full article (0.76Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.dsp · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in comp.dsp
Author: John O'Flaherty
Date: Apr 19, 2008 09:01

Show full article (2.92Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.dsp · Group Profile · Search for Continuous Random Variable in comp.dsp
Author: Tim Wescott
Date: Apr 19, 2008 09:00

Show full article (5.59Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next