PD wrote: On Aug 17, 5:13 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote: PD wrote: On Aug 17, 4:54 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote: PD wrote: Define "current" and "next" without physical time. Define "physical time" physically. That's what I'm asking Peter. No, I just asked you to define is physically
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:50:46 -0400, "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@ugs.nojunk.com> wrote: So which is it, I'm not enjoying this, or I'm enjoying it *too* much? As with everything in life, the truth is actually somewhere inbetween. :-) Boy you've got more flip flops than a John Kerry campaign. Not really. Oh boy, *I'm* sure convinced. I've never been personally offended by
On 2008-06-18, gpsman <gpsman@driversmail.com> wrote: Ahhh, I knew there was more to this story. No asshat... you have a shit-poor memory and reading comprehension as you demonstrate time and time again. *Sometimes* evil truckers *will* block the lanes behind stop and go (or slow and go) traffic backups, driving a bit slower than the backup, with one truck driving the shoulder
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:04:16 -0500, John Lansford <jlnsford@bellsouth.net> wrote: Dave Head <rally2xs@att.net> wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:19:53 -0500, John Lansford <jlnsford@bellsouth.net> wrote: I think that the best way to reduce work zone accidents would be not to have so many work zones. I noted before leaving Indiana over 10 years ago that the state would
John Lansford wrote: Dave Head <rally2xs@att.net> wrote: On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:19:53 -0500, John Lansford <jlnsford@bellsouth.net> wrote: I think that the best way to reduce work zone accidents would be not to have so many work zones. I noted before leaving Indiana over 10 years ago that the state would open many, many work zones on its interstate highways
