On Sep 12, 5:52 am, "." <Rhiann...@gmail.com> wrote: The term conception does not mean the active or generative conception by her parents. Her body was formed in the womb of the mother, and the father had the usual share in its formation. The question does not concern the immaculateness of the generative activity of her parents. Neither does it concern the passive conception absolutely
On Sep 11, 11:20�pm, Twibil <jose.now...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sep 11, 8:56�pm, "S'mee" <stevenkei...@hotmail.com> wrote: Nope I learned a neat trick from a catholic girl I dated for awhile, it's called "Immaculate excretion" you never have to take a shit again. Let's see: in an "immaculate conception" the sperm is assumed to have come from God (and there has to be sperm
The Feast of the Immaculate Conception The older feast of the Conception of Mary (Conception of St. Anne), which originated in the monasteries of Palestine at least as early as the seventh century, and the modern feast of the Immaculate Conception are not identical in their object. Originally the Church celebrated only the Feast of the Conception of Mary, as she kept the Feast of St. John's
Vitae forma vocatur immaculata.conceptio@hotmail.com, die Sun, 25 Nov 2007 02:59:44 -0800 (PST), in littera <7278d08d-0789-4dcb-8044-6275f4440207@o42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> in foro soc.culture.belgium(et aliis) vere scripsit quod sequitur: On 1 nov, 22:31, "Sal Khalbar" <sal.khal...@invalid.org.net> wrote: "M. Delaniche" <m.delani...@obsoleteNOSPAM.com> a écrit dans le message denews
pit_kl2000@yahoo.de wrote: On 17 Okt., 07:27, Franz Glaser <fr...@meg-glaser.com> wrote: pit_kl2...@yahoo.de wrote: Der ganze Marienkult hat also in der rrK keine Bedeutung? Zeigst du uns demnächst noch einen 23fachen Salto rückwärts? Stellst du etwa den Eckpfeiler der katholischen Lehre die immaculata conceptio der "Gottesmutter" in Frage? So lateinisch wie
