You are missing your ability to google ;-) Try googling "exchange message limits", you'll get many tutorials with an MS article second item down: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322679 -- Allan Williams "ComputerWorks" <ComputerWorks@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:A985F559-7717-405E-9525-05E05A7BE635@microsoft.com... Hi all, Losing hair on this one:

Mail received on spamtrap. This spamtrap mail has been redacted, the mail was not really sent to <Johnathon@users.spamikaze.org>. URLs have been stripped of the parts before and after the host name. From ejacquet@computerworks.net Thu Apr 17 17:20:20 2008 Return-path: <ejacquet@computerworks.net> Received: from [mail.victim.example] (helo=humbolt.mail.victim.example) by shelob.surriel.com

Daniel Krebs <spam.astacus@t-online.de> wrote: Andreas Rutishauser <andreas@macandreas.ch> wrote: die Sarotech Hard Box haben das... Erhaeltlich mit FW 400/800/USB2.0/eSATA fuer IDE oder SATA Platten. Als Gehaeuse kaufen, und Platte nach Wahl einbauen (ohne Werkzeug). Wird in D moeglicherweise von ComputerWorks vertriebeb (in CH jedenfalls) Ich habe eine. Der Einbau

-- P R E A M B L E -- The following URL domains were present in the sample email and at the time of processing resolved as indicated: gadball.com as 216.23.176.67 More info http://www.blockalert.com/?view=arin&level=1&start=216.023.160.000 It is possible that the following email was not actually spam or that some domains present in it do not represent willingly spamvertized destination