Computergeek
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 14 articles for 0.303 sec
On Aug 20, 6:30 am, "_ G O D _" <DEMI...@TELUS.NET> wrote: > Maybe more by now. And it is steadily growing at a > very fast rate. Therefore, the future is much brighter > than you think, you COck-sucking americunt retard.... You enlightening information is no doubt of interest, but unfortunately you're not posting on alt.computergeeks. Would you now like to cite some evidence in support of     

Group: alt.prisons · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.prisons
Author: John-Melb
Date: Aug 19, 2008 15:35

Hartmut Figge wrote: Barbara(OR): Hartmut Figge wrote: Heute ist es für mich augenblicklich etwa Spätnachmittag. Morgen kann es zu der gleichen Zeit schon ganz anders aussehen. Hartmut, flexibel ROFL Ihr ComputerGeeks are alle gleich. Beisst eure Zaehne in ein Problem und Schlaf ist vergessen. Ach, mit Büchern ist das auch nicht anders. Wenn man gerade
Show full article (0.42Kb) · Show article thread
Barbara(OR): >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> Heute ist es für mich augenblicklich etwa Spätnachmittag. Morgen kann >> es zu der gleichen Zeit schon ganz anders aussehen. >> >> Hartmut, flexibel >ROFL Ihr ComputerGeeks are alle gleich. Beisst eure Zaehne in ein >Problem und Schlaf ist vergessen. Ach, mit Büchern ist das auch nicht anders. Wenn man gerade ein spannendes hat, wie sollte man     

Group: de.alt.dateien.misc · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in de.alt.dateien.misc
Author: Barbara(OR)
Date: Oct 2, 2007 19:07

Hartmut Figge wrote: Barbara(OR): P.S. Du bist entweder sehr spaet oder sehr frueh auf, LOL welches ist es? Heute ist es für mich augenblicklich etwa Spätnachmittag. Morgen kann es zu der gleichen Zeit schon ganz anders aussehen. Hartmut, flexibel ROFL Ihr ComputerGeeks are alle gleich. Beisst eure Zaehne in ein Problem und Schlaf ist vergessen. -- Barbara
Show full article (0.58Kb) · Show article thread
On Sep 4, 10:28 pm, "meagain" <b.jew...@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote: > What is the expiry date on the boxes? > Thanks."ComputerGeek" <ronsta...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message > > news:1188908330.673893.22740@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > > > >I had an HP 2000 printer that just died on me and I bought a > > different > > model, so now I have a bunch of new cartridges/printheads for sale > >     

Group: de.alt.dateien.misc · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in de.alt.dateien.misc
Author: Hartmut Figge
Date: Oct 2, 2007 18:53

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:32:25 -0400, Kyle wrote: Newegg.com uses a similar setup, where the UPS shipper is printed from a web page for the RMA'd product package. Computergeeks.com provided ultimate RMA service for me a few years ago, they shipped the replacement item with no questions asked and included in the shipment the UPS or Fedex shipper to return the defective product, quite
Show full article (0.52Kb) · Show article thread
"Ron Gibson" <rsgibson@verizon.net> wrote in message news:pan.2007.04.10.05.35.30.420651@verizon.net... | On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:49:32 -0400, Kyle wrote: | | > I had good service/results from Crucial in replacing a 256Meg stick a | > while back. Would give them good marks for my experience, their memory | > includes a lifetime guarantee also. | | I'm sure the memory is all about the same     

Group: de.alt.dateien.misc · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in de.alt.dateien.misc
Author: Barbara(OR)
Date: Oct 2, 2007 18:43

"Never seen anything so blatant"? In case you didn't know, and you probably don't, I bought the Eva Solo myself to test out - it wasn't supplied by any company. Every review on the website has a link to where to buy - in most cases, the supplier of the product gets that link. In this particular case, since I bought it myself, I linked to the website's amazon affiliate account. AFTER the review
Show full article (0.43Kb) · Show article thread
Guys, could everybody be a little less ad hominem? Maybe whoever it is with the weird address would be helped if Mark said a little about why it was chosen and why the others were not. CoffeeKid wrote: > Robert Harmon wrote: > > w1r3d1@yahoo.com wrote in news:1166644032.108990.86270 > > @f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > > > SNIPPED > > > > > Just my take, but I'm wondering what is your     

Group: ns.forsale · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in ns.forsale
Author: Computer Geek
Date: Sep 12, 2007 03:57

Robert Harmon wrote: w1r3d1@yahoo.com wrote in news:1166644032.108990.86270 @f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: SNIPPED Just my take, but I'm wondering what is your take on this type of awarding system, and when the manufacturers are clients of the editor, should they be eligible for "Best of" type awards? Do you have any proof that the ratings are 'for sale'
Show full article (1.30Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.os.windows2000 · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.os.windows2000
Author: Ron Gibson
Date: Apr 10, 2007 12:24

Show full article (1.19Kb)
    

Group: alt.os.windows2000 · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.os.windows2000
Author: Kyle
Date: Apr 10, 2007 10:32

Show full article (1.50Kb)
    

Group: alt.coffee · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.coffee
Author: CoffeeKid
Date: Dec 22, 2006 10:29

Show full article (4.21Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.coffee · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.coffee
Author: Omniryx
Date: Dec 20, 2006 13:05

Show full article (1.50Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.coffee · Group Profile · Search for Computergeek in alt.coffee
Author: CoffeeKid
Date: Dec 20, 2006 12:56

Show full article (1.25Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next