On Aug 15, 11:21 am, "mark.tomles" <mark.tom...@yahoo.com> wrote: Just for kicks and grins, I started trying to verify random posts by Trudy. I'm actually surprised that I can't find any evidence of a single one. I figured they were just old posts, but it looks like they're completely fabricated, based on the lack of evidence, Is that an OSA tactic, or is she just trying to keep her
On Aug 15, 12:46 pm, jerald <jerald-ja...@hotmail.com> wrote: On Aug 15, 11:21 am, "mark.tomles" <mark.tom...@yahoo.com> wrote: Just for kicks and grins, I started trying to verify random posts by Trudy. I'm actually surprised that I can't find any evidence of a single one. I figured they were just old posts, but it looks like they're completely fabricated, based on the lack
On Aug 15, 9:29 am, Obscene Dog <obscene....@xenu.com> wrote: On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:21:53 -0700, mark.tomles wrote: Just for kicks and grins, I started trying to verify random posts by Trudy. I'm actually surprised that I can't find any evidence of a single one. I figured they were just old posts, but it looks like they're completely fabricated, based on the lack of evidence
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:21:53 -0700, mark.tomles wrote: Just for kicks and grins, I started trying to verify random posts by Trudy. I'm actually surprised that I can't find any evidence of a single one. I figured they were just old posts, but it looks like they're completely fabricated, based on the lack of evidence, Is that an OSA tactic, or is she just trying to keep her upstats?
