Package: aspell Version: 0.60.6-1 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, in prog/aspell.cpp:status_fun() is another output format defined: const CheckInfo * ci = p->real_speller->check_info(); if (ci->compound) COUT.put("-\n"); else if (ci->pre_flag || ci->suf_flag) COUT.printf("+ %%s\n", p->oconv(ci->word.str())); else COUT.put("*\n"); %% aspell -d
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 07:44:51PM +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: X-debbugs-cc: davidc@debian.org Package: dictionaries-common Version: 0.98.10 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dictionaries-common/flyspell.el OK, my goal now is to have flyspell use the wamerican-huge dictionary. You see it is driving me nuts to have "fortuneteller", "ridgeline"
On Feb 11, 9:31 pm, Keep the kids home schooled and serve up the squirrels <fastpitst...@aol.com> wrote: On Feb 11, 7:30�pm, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:> Bush, Eugenics and Population Control Shalom aleikhem; In April 1974, Kissinger drew up a secret plan for population control called the 'National Security Plan of Action 200' (NSSM 200), L'Shalom...
* Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> [2008-01-07 23:54]: So if you notice any common misspelled words that Lintian doesn't catch, please let debian-lint-maint know and we'll add them to the table. The name of the S-Lang library is sometimes wrongly spelled as "slang". It would be good to have this fixed but if you add a rule slang -> S-Lang in Lintian you will hit some false positives (like
[Luca Capello] It seems that I cannot find a comparison of the differences spell checkers. Please, could you enlighten me on why hunspell should be a better default one? I can only refer to the knowledge I have gotten from those I know that work on spell checkers. The features of spell checkers is normally how well they handle word transformations, concatenations and proposals.
