Comment stats
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 10683 articles for 0.701 sec
matttelles@sprynet.com wrote: > On Jun 7, 5:40 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> > wrote: >> Matt wrote: >>> On Jun 7, 4:27 pm, "Scout" >>> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: >>>> Matt wrote: >>>>> On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote >>>>>> innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68     

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: Scout
Date: Jun 7, 2010 18:21

On Jun 7, 5:40 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: Matt wrote: On Jun 7, 4:27 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: Matt wrote: On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68-5da9924ef4e1@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com
Show full article (4.21Kb) · Show article thread
Matt wrote: > On Jun 7, 4:27 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> > wrote: >> Matt wrote: >>> On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: >>>> Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote >>>> innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68-5da9924ef4e1@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: >> >>>>> On Jun 6, 4:40 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>     

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: matttelles
Date: Jun 7, 2010 18:03

On Jun 7, 4:27 pm, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote: Matt wrote: On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68-5da9924ef4e1@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Jun 6, 4:40 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: Matt <matttel...@sprynet
Show full article (3.80Kb) · Show article thread
Matt wrote: > On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: >> Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote >> innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68-5da9924ef4e1@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 6, 4:40 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: >>>> Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote >>>> innews:b7ffc75c-7068-4e54-a7e2-54b6ff >>> 2a9...@6g2000prg     

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: Scout
Date: Jun 7, 2010 16:40

On Jun 7, 2:35 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote innews:f11f951a-a9bf-4eec-9b68-5da9924ef4e1@q36g2000prg.googlegroups.com: On Jun 6, 4:40 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman@comcast[remove].net> wrote: Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote innews:b7ffc75c-7068-4e54-a7e2-54b6ff 2a9...@6g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
Show full article (3.51Kb) · Show article thread
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 15:00:36 -0800 (PST), "tshanno@gmail.com" <tshanno@gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 25, 9:01 am, Frank Sereno <fserenonos...@nospamsbcglobal.net> >wrote: > > >> I haven't watched the Steelers this year, but the stats show they >> are only gaining 100 yards per game on the ground while gaining >> 207 through the air. > >Its been a down year for them and the stats are atypical     

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: Matt
Date: Jun 7, 2010 15:59

In article ruschak@wintek.com says... To me, the only use for a running game is: 1) As a change of pace from the pass, to keep the defense honest. Can't call all passes. 2) To run out the clock and protect a lead in the 4th quarter or sometimes at the end of the half. 3) To use during inclement weather (rain). 4) Control the clock and keep your defense off
Show full article (3.35Kb) · Show article thread
tshanno@gmail.com wrote: > On Dec 24, 10:07 pm, Gary C <KlemKadiddlehop...@CrazyGuggenheimer.com> > wrote: >> Thomas Ruschak wrote: > >>> Anyway, just some reflexive ranting triggered by your support for the >>> "run first" philosophy :-) > >> Great post , Tom. Thanks for taking the time to do so. > > Yes, good points. I still disagree, though. :) > > Of course, no one is going     

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: Scout
Date: Jun 7, 2010 15:27

Show full article (3.10Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.republican · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.politics.republican
Author: Matt
Date: Jun 7, 2010 14:51

Show full article (8.51Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears
Author: mercutio
Date: Dec 25, 2008 15:52

Show full article (0.62Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears
Author: tshanno
Date: Dec 25, 2008 15:00

Show full article (0.30Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears
Author: Mark Anderson
Date: Dec 25, 2008 11:17

Show full article (1.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears · Group Profile · Search for Comment stats in alt.sports.football.pro.chicagobears
Author: Frank Sereno
Date: Dec 25, 2008 07:01

Show full article (2.09Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next