"Keynes" <Keynes@earthlinkspam.net> wrote in message news:v8up23pg1funbrlss8f914nnrdeogtp8j0@4ax.com... On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:40:40 GMT, "buddhapest" <pestaroonie@netzero.com> wrote: "Keynes" <Keynes@earthlinkspam.net> wrote in message news:50ep231b61uvk5oculs78ijrdnabcnnd04@4ax.com... foot wrote [on some newsgroup most likely:] How is it easy
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:40:40 GMT, "buddhapest" <pestaroonie@netzero.com> wrote: "Keynes" <Keynes@earthlinkspam.net> wrote in message news:50ep231b61uvk5oculs78ijrdnabcnnd04@4ax.com... foot wrote [on some newsgroup most likely:] How is it easy to clarify that there is no self? Are you speaking of defining away the personhood of each apparant person
"Keynes" <Keynes@earthlinkspam.net> wrote in message news:50ep231b61uvk5oculs78ijrdnabcnnd04@4ax.com... foot wrote [on some newsgroup most likely:] How is it easy to clarify that there is no self? Are you speaking of defining away the personhood of each apparant person by simply saying that there isn't one? No, more like inquiring
--- Chetto <Chetto@gmail.com> wrote: On Apr 19, 10:38 pm, Robert Epstein <epstein...@yahoo.com> wrote: Dave K wrote: On Apr 18, 1:38 am, Robert Epstein <epstein...@yahoo.com> wrote: <Holly stuff snipped for brevity> >Hi Holly. >I think you are confusing the term "self" with a functional person being >able to do things. In Buddhist terms
