On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:41:02 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug <doug@none> wrote: [Hammond] 1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists. [Doug, unverified Physics PhD
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 12:31:27 -0700, none <""doug\"@(none)"> wrote: George Hammond wrote: On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:33:49 -0700, doug <doug@none> wrote: [Hammond] 1. If Man does not exist, then nothing exists. [Doug, Physics PhD claimant] This is an unsupported assumption which is actually what you are trying to prove. Thus your "proof" is DOA.
Mrs. Cleaver was pretty hot. :) Linda "PPPG" <sjohnston@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message news:472a3658$1$24343$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... "Pete Wilcox" <pw2@st-andrews.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.60.0711011810400.6111@squire... Now, there's a thing that's been puzzling me for quite some time. (Well, the past six months or so...) Perhaps someone with a closer "ear to
in article 1178568724.919015.173010@h2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, Tracey12 at tracey12_12_12@yahoo.com wrote on 5/7/07 4:12 PM: On May 7, 3:08 pm, Tracey12 <tracey12_12...@yahoo.com> wrote: Amazingly, the democrat party is becoming the party of hate. They hate so many aspects of American life now, they are almost forcing themselves to leave the USA. Here is an incomplete list of
