Chatched
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 49 articles for 0.302 sec
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:48:00 -0700, Eric <Eric@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >I have made sure that the [Review_ID] is not a primary key in the >Observation table. There are plenty of other "Review" related fields in the >Chatch all, but I have already segregated them out to other tables and will >be using this union method on all of them to normalize the database. Please post the     

Group: microsoft.public.access.modulesdaovba · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in microsoft.public.access.modulesdaovba
Author: John W. Vinson
Date: Aug 18, 2008 17:05

Thanks again John, I'm still getting an error: (Invalid SQL statement, expected 'DELETE', INSERT', 'PROCEDURE', 'SELECT', or 'UPDATE', Not sure what its wanting here. It CANNOT be the primary key for the new table! There will be (up to) 20 records for each Review_ID value, and the primary key must, by definition, be unique. You may want to use a two-field primary key consisting
Show full article (1.19Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 4, 8:01 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> > wrote:> Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: > > > > ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum > > > theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me > > > wonder what his point is... > > ------------------------- > it is not Eric     

Group: microsoft.public.access.modulesdaovba · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in microsoft.public.access.modulesdaovba
Author: Eric
Date: Aug 18, 2008 14:48

On Aug 4, 8:01 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> wrote:> Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me wonder what his point is... ------------------------- it is not Eric
Show full article (3.72Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 4, 8:01 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> > wrote:> Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: > > > > ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum > > > theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me > > > wonder what his point is... > > ------------------------- > it is not Eric     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 23:27

On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> wrote: Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me wonder what his point is... ------------------------- it is not Eric Gisse !! i was rorking on that little idiot crook and other ones
Show full article (4.13Kb) · Show article thread
On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> wrote: > Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: > > > > > ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum > > theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me > > wonder what his point is... ------------------------- it is not Eric Gisse !! i was rorking on that little idiot crook and other ones     

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics.particle
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 23:27

On Aug 3, 6:37 pm, Strich 9 <Strich.9.2db9...@physicsbanter.com> wrote: Eric Gisse;1201768 Wrote: ...Every modern treatment of relativity and various flavors of quantum theory I have seen all treat mass as an invariant, which makes me wonder what his point is... ------------------------- it is not Eric Gisse !! i was rorking on that little idiot crook and other ones
Show full article (4.13Kb) · Show article thread
1st of all - A BIG Thank YOu for the time you took to reply. I've interspersed some additional information and comments. (Bob) On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:53:06 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: >On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:32:08 GMT, Bob <rmiers@pinalinternet.net> >wrote: > >>I've been asked to assist with a D-Link DWL-2700A access point at a RV >>park. > >Not too horrible a unit     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 23:27

On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:32:08 GMT, Bob <rmiers@pinalinternet.net> wrote: I've been asked to assist with a D-Link DWL-2700A access point at a RV park. Not too horrible a unit. It should work. <http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=303> Practice on the emulator before you destroy something: <http://support.dlink.com/Emulators/dwl2700ap_revb/html/index.htm> The owners are unhappy with
Show full article (4.13Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 22:01

Show full article (3.14Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics.particle · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics.particle
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 22:01

Show full article (3.14Kb)
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in sci.physics
Author: Y.Porat
Date: Aug 3, 2008 22:01

Show full article (3.14Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.internet.wireless · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in alt.internet.wireless
Author: Bob
Date: Jun 21, 2008 20:04

Show full article (8.12Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.internet.wireless · Group Profile · Search for Chatched in alt.internet.wireless
Author: Jeff Liebermann
Date: Jun 21, 2008 16:53

Show full article (5.17Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next