Characterizable
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 42 articles for 0.304 sec
mb wrote: > On Jun 9, 3:05 pm, Roland Hutchinson <my.spamt...@verizon.net> wrote: >> mb wrote: >> > ... >> >> >> He seems to know and >> >> >> care nothing about anything that has been written by theologians >> >> >> over the course of the last millenium or three > ... > >> >> > and it is such dismissal on principle that you call "arrogant", >> >> > showing that you know and care nothing     

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: Roland Hutchinson
Date: Jun 9, 2008 16:02

Jeffrey Turner wrote: Don Phillipson wrote: outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below. Peter looked ______ at his party because he didn't pass his final exam. A.happy B.happily C.sad D.sadly Among the discussion, some argued the answer should be C, and some D. As for me, I don't think it is a well-edited
Show full article (5.29Kb) · Show article thread
Don Phillipson wrote: >>outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: >> >>>Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below. >>>~~~~~~~ >>>Peter looked ______ at his party because he didn't pass his final >>>exam. >>>A.happy B.happily C.sad D.sadly >>>~~~~~~~ >>> >>>Among the discussion, some argued the answer should be C, and some D. >>>As for me, I don't think it is a well-edited test question     

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: CDB
Date: Jun 2, 2008 06:36

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 07:20:10 -0400, "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote: "John O'Flaherty" <quiasmox@yeeha.com> wrote in message news:q15444pt9eji8bqldq7hkj9hm5t4paf3rf@4ax.com... On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:24:48 -0400, "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote: outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below.
Show full article (1.94Kb) · Show article thread
"John O'Flaherty" <quiasmox@yeeha.com> wrote in message news:q15444pt9eji8bqldq7hkj9hm5t4paf3rf@4ax.com... > On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:24:48 -0400, "Don Phillipson" > <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote: > > >> outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: > >> > Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below. > >> > ~~~~~~~ > >> > Peter looked ______ at his party because he didn't pass his final > >> > exam     

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: Jeffrey Turner
Date: Jun 2, 2008 05:09

On Sat, 31 May 2008 19:24:48 -0400, "Don Phillipson" <e925@SPAMBLOCK.ncf.ca> wrote: outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below. ~~~~~~~ Peter looked ______ at his party because he didn't pass his final exam. A.happy B.happily C.sad D.sadly ~~~~~~~ Among the discussion, some argued the answer should
Show full article (1.32Kb) · Show article thread
> outofdejavu@gmail.com wrote: > > Someone on a Taiwanese forum asked the question below. > > ~~~~~~~ > > Peter looked ______ at his party because he didn't pass his final > > exam. > > A.happy B.happily C.sad D.sadly > > ~~~~~~~ > > > > Among the discussion, some argued the answer should be C, and some D. > > As for me, I don't think it is a well-edited test question, for > > "party     

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: John O'Flaherty
Date: Jun 1, 2008 08:09

nospam@isp.com wrote: On 13 Apr 2008, jim <jim10293@gmail.com> wrote: It is very easy to see why blacks support Obama. But, to see why intelligent people do takes some real pondering. This is a perhaps interestingly stated claimed dichotomy -- interesting, at least, in what it (deliberately? inadvertently?) communicates to the reader about the above poster's presumptions
Show full article (2.68Kb) · Show article thread
On 13 Apr 2008, jim <jim10293@gmail.com> wrote: > It is very easy to see why blacks support Obama. > But, to see why intelligent people do takes some > real pondering. This is a perhaps interestingly stated claimed dichotomy -- interesting, at least, in what it (deliberately? inadvertently?) communicates to the reader about the above poster's presumptions, defined here by him as if characterizable     

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: Don Phillipson
Date: Jun 1, 2008 04:20

Tom Reedy wrote: Peter Farey wrote: Tom Reedy wrote (in the REDATING THE TEMPEST thread): I dunno, Peter. Although I understand your arguments (I think), I don't understand why you hold the belief that Marlowe wrote the Shakespearean canon. I don't know that you've ever explained that. My reasons? First, that Shakespeare's monument
Show full article (2.25Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: John O'Flaherty
Date: May 31, 2008 20:19

Show full article (1.54Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.usage.english · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in alt.usage.english
Author: Don Phillipson
Date: May 31, 2008 16:24

Show full article (1.07Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in soc.retirement
Author: High Miles
Date: Apr 14, 2008 10:47

Show full article (0.72Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in soc.retirement
Author: nospam
Date: Apr 14, 2008 10:28

Show full article (0.62Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare · Group Profile · Search for Characterizable in humanities.lit.authors.shakespeare
Author: Peter Farey
Date: Mar 31, 2008 07:44

Show full article (10.96Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next