Characterists
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 870 articles for 0.788 sec
On Sep 7, 5:18 am, "Jim Wilkins" <muratla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It could hide from a few scattered aircraft but any concentration would keep > it down and defenseless against them and their sonobuoys and homing > torpedos. In the heavily patrolled Bay of Biscay radar warning receivers > sounded off continuously and uselessly. > > jsw The USN tested the Type XXI and found that when using     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Eunometic
Date: Sep 6, 2011 17:15

On Aug 7, 9:05 pm, Paul F Austin <pfaus...@bellsouth.net> wrote: On 8/7/2011 1:21 AM, Ian B MacLure wrote: peterweze...@hotmail.com wrote in news:d6913cda-2dc7-49b0-9412- d34490043...@q15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com: I am interested in hearing from anyone who has flown any model of Boeing B-52 bomber. I am particularly interested in how these planes fly
Show full article (1.31Kb) · Show article thread
Easy solution - switch off electronic compensation and reconnect LX5000 to be parallel to TE Winter. I had this solution on my previous plane and it worked well. Electronic compensation on older computers generally does not function as well as good old TE probe, it is very dependant on characteristics of static ports used for it. If you are aware about cross-talks between LX and Winter, then     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Eunometic
Date: Aug 17, 2011 04:41

On 7/5/2011 12:18 AM, Eunometic wrote: On Jul 5, 3:16 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: On 7/4/2011 9:52 PM, Eunometic wrote: On Jul 5, 1:10 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: Operational Flying Wings were still decades off. You can build it but control it is another matter. The Avionics to do so was well past everyones capability in 1945/46
Show full article (2.58Kb)
On Jul 5, 3:16 pm, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: > On 7/4/2011 9:52 PM, Eunometic wrote: > > > On Jul 5, 1:10 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com>  wrote: > > >> Operational Flying Wings were still decades off.  You can build > >> it but control it is another matter.  The Avionics to do so was > >> well past everyones capability in 1945/46. > > > The Me 163 had excellent handling     

Group: rec.aviation.soaring · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.soaring
Author: StaPo
Date: Jul 13, 2011 23:41

On 7/4/2011 9:52 PM, Eunometic wrote: On Jul 5, 1:10 pm, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: Operational Flying Wings were still decades off. You can build it but control it is another matter. The Avionics to do so was well past everyones capability in 1945/46. The Me 163 had excellent handling and stalling characteristics so that disproves your claim to start
Show full article (0.55Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 5, 1:10 pm, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote: > > Operational Flying Wings were still decades off.  You can build > it but control it is another matter.  The Avionics to do so was > well past everyones capability in 1945/46. > The Me 163 had excellent handling and stalling characteristics so that disproves your claim to start with though it is a tailess aircraft rather than a     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Daryl
Date: Jul 4, 2011 23:43

"FragSinatra" <perhaps@not.com> wrote in message news:Xns9EEE105A6E869perhapsnotcom@202.177.16.121... I've read that tungsten-carbide is more dense and stiffer than steel. So were the AT rounds used in this cannon kinda like depleted uranium rounds? What does the "squeezebore" aspect of these rounds refer to? Was the cartridge case bigger than the cannon shell itself? I've read that
Show full article (6.58Kb) · Show article thread
On May 22, 5:12 pm, "Sunny" <wombathou...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > "LIBERATOR" <markz...@ymail.com> wrote in message > > news:6c9de1f7-29e3-4dc1-9fb7-ba9b175737c3@k16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On May 22, 1:30 am, "Sunny" <wombathou...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > "LIBERATOR" <markz...@ymail.com> wrote in message > > >news:273002ee-a37a-42ee-92a3-e13e95b60c97@b42g2000yqi.googlegroups     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Eunometic
Date: Jul 4, 2011 23:18

On May 22, 5:12 pm, "Sunny" <wombathou...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: "LIBERATOR" <markz...@ymail.com> wrote in message news:6c9de1f7-29e3-4dc1-9fb7-ba9b175737c3@k16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On May 22, 1:30 am, "Sunny" <wombathou...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: "LIBERATOR" <markz...@ymail.com> wrote in message news:273002ee-a37a-42ee-92a3-e13e95b60c97@b42g2000yqi.googlegroups
Show full article (4.19Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Daryl
Date: Jul 4, 2011 22:16

Show full article (3.84Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: Eunometic
Date: Jul 4, 2011 20:52

Show full article (2.71Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: coffelt2
Date: May 23, 2011 21:48

Show full article (2.31Kb)
    

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in rec.aviation.military
Author: LIBERATOR
Date: May 23, 2011 21:41

Show full article (1.96Kb)
    

Group: alt.revisionism · Group Profile · Search for Characterists in alt.revisionism
Author: LIBERATOR
Date: May 23, 2011 21:41

Show full article (1.96Kb)
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next