Cartered
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 333 articles for 1.700 sec
>It came as no surprise to anybody when the Ways and Means Committee >rejected the Carter 50-cent standby tax by a vote of 27 to 10. A >majority of Democrats joined all 12 Republicans in defeating the >proposal. The committee even refused to approve a 3-cent-per-gallon >increase to raise revenue for public transportation, energy research, >and conservation. > >The Carter gas-tax-with-rebate     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in soc.history.whatif
Author: Allen W. McDonnell
Date: Jan 28, 2010 20:12

"Daniel Titley" <aber80@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:74b19d1c-6341-44aa-adc1-278c539449f8@l19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On 28 Jan, 02:42, "Allen W. McDonnell" <tan...@peakoil.com> wrote: You really think an automatic monthly tax rise going to get through Congress without a huge arguement? It is all about the timing and stealthyness. James Carter proposed a 50 cent tax increase
Show full article (1.34Kb) · Show article thread
On Jan 28, 4:19 pm, Shawn <Jargon19...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Back in 1977 with a huge Democratic Congress and President, it just > might.  The whole tax revolt movement had started but not reached its > height yet.  Tax increases weren't as unpopular then as they are > today.  Give the baby boomers credit (or blame) on this one. Nobody likes higher taxes. ever. Well, unless a War was     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in soc.history.whatif
Author: Allen W. McDonnell
Date: Jan 28, 2010 20:04

On Jan 28, 3:29 pm, Daniel Titley <abe...@googlemail.com> wrote: On 28 Jan, 02:42, "Allen W. McDonnell" <tan...@peakoil.com> wrote: "Hmm, this is certainly a simple law, I don't see any problem getting it through without a problem." the Speaker replied. "Agreed, this one is so short and simple I think it will sail through without any objection, especially if I time it right
Show full article (1.37Kb) · Show article thread
On 28 Jan, 02:42, "Allen W. McDonnell" <tan...@peakoil.com> wrote: > "Hmm, this is certainly a simple law, I don't see any problem getting it > through without a problem." the Speaker replied. > "Agreed, this one is so short and simple I think it will sail through > without any objection, especially if I time it right." the President Pro Tem > of the Senate replied. > > Thus the new law was     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in soc.history.whatif
Author: mike
Date: Jan 28, 2010 17:29

(Ersetze <j20oju$sj3$1@dont-email.me>) Als wenn die Schlachten in London etwas neues wären. 16.09.1985 Aufruhr in England: Das war Krieg, Mann Im Farbigen-Getto von Birmingham entluden sich Rassenhaß und soziale Spannungen in Straßenschlachten und Plünderungen von Geschäften. Margaret Thatchers Regierung sah bei den Krawallen nur Kriminelle am Werk - doch in den Elendsvierteln der
Show full article (6.10Kb) · Show article thread
Am 13.07.2011 19:36, schrieb Ulrich Nehls: > Am 13.07.2011 18:55, schrieb Wolfgang Schwanke: > >> Die autofreien Sonntage waren quasi Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der >> Bundesregierung. Man wollte die Wahrnehmung, dass Rohstoffe endlich >> und knapp seien, in der Bevölkerung verankern. > > Das ist frei daherfantasiert. Von Rohstoffen hat doch damals kein Aas > gesprochen. Nanu, ich erinnere mich     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in soc.history.whatif
Author: Shawn
Date: Jan 28, 2010 14:19

Am 13.07.2011 19:36, schrieb Ulrich Nehls: Am 13.07.2011 18:55, schrieb Wolfgang Schwanke: Die autofreien Sonntage waren quasi Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der Bundesregierung. Man wollte die Wahrnehmung, dass Rohstoffe endlich und knapp seien, in der Bevölkerung verankern. Das ist frei daherfantasiert. Von Rohstoffen hat doch damals kein Aas gesprochen. Nanu, ich erinnere mich
Show full article (1.32Kb) · Show article thread
Bluesfan2U <bluesfan2u@fun.ogr> wrote in news:jMudnattKK6-l4vTnZ2dnUVZ5uqdnZ2d@giganews.com: > On 6/27/2011 12:24 AM, Gunner Asch wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 02:17:27 -0500, Gray Ghost >> <grey_ghost471-newsgroups@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Let me guess, NAZIs were / are commies. >>>>>> >>>>>> No. They are Socialists. As were the Stalinists of the same time. >>>>>> Not even the red     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in soc.history.whatif
Author: Daniel Titley
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:29

On Jul 7, 10:16 am, Gray Ghost <grey_ghost471-newsgro...@yahoo.com> wrote: Solletica <sollet...@gmail.com> wrote in news:b3d000b7-ccd6-45dc-beeb- 7a54ca4ab...@v7g2000vbk.googlegroups.com: Their Messiahs rush, sean, and bill require it, and so do their female Messiahettes bachmann and palin. We're going to make listening to Rush a requirement to vote. The rightards will
Show full article (0.94Kb)
    

Group: de.soc.politik.misc · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in de.soc.politik.misc
Author: Robin Hood
Date: Aug 11, 2011 07:29

Show full article (1.79Kb)
    

Group: de.soc.verkehr · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in de.soc.verkehr
Author: Herbert Albrecht
Date: Jul 14, 2011 00:24

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: de.soc.umwelt · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in de.soc.umwelt
Author: Herbert Albrecht
Date: Jul 14, 2011 00:24

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: az.politics · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in az.politics
Author: Gray Ghost
Date: Jul 7, 2011 20:52

Show full article (2.40Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: az.politics · Group Profile · Search for Cartered in az.politics
Author: Solletica
Date: Jul 7, 2011 18:48

Show full article (0.90Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next