On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:45:34 +0200, Mirac wrote: Sigma 105mm f/2.8 macro, star dvije i pol godine u odlicnom stanju.. Kupcu na poklon Canon 500D closed up lens, vise o leci na http://www.camerahobby.com/Access-Canon500D.htm Sold Sigma 70-200 f/2.8, stara dvije i pol godine (oguljen onaj mat dio kojim je objektiv presvucen) + UV filter Sold -- www.mirko-sorak.com www

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 macro, star dvije i pol godine u odlicnom stanju.. Kupcu na poklon Canon 500D closed up lens, vise o leci na http://www.camerahobby.com/Access-Canon500D.htm Sigma 70-200 f/2.8, stara dvije i pol godine (oguljen onaj mat dio kojim je objektiv presvucen) + UV filter Oba objektiva ispravna.. Pojima nemam kako se krecu cijene tako da ide najboljem ponudjacu ;-) -

"Don W" <mail@mail.invalid> wrote in message news:Xns985083882E70A74C1H4@127.0.0.1... QUESTION: How does this sort of compact digital camera lens (or even those from the slightly better compacts digicams) compare to those old lenses without going to the extreme: It is as bit more complicated comparing digitsl to film, because on digital the lens is not the only factor that

Thirty or 40 years ago I used to have a Pentax Spotmatic (printing black and white in my own darkroom) and graduated onto several other SLRs from there. I used labs for color. My pictures were never printed beyond 10 x 8 and to be honest you might call the majority of my photos as "high quality family pictures". After years of SLRs and some higher quality 35mm compacts, I didn't really