...you are correct. On the 64 bits dll listed as belonging to our... our surrogate infrastructure (because the bit model does not differ) and ... not available in 64 bits (except on Windows Server 2003 x64,... WS2008 both 64 bit. Whatever the order of registration, I only ... typelib from the last registered DLL. Willy. Did some more tests ...

...you are correct. On the 64 bits dll listed as belonging to our...use our surrogate infrastructure (because the bit model does not differ) and sometimes... not available in 64 bits (except on Windows Server 2003 x64, ... WS2008 both 64 bit. Whatever the order of registration, I only ... typelib from the last registered DLL. Willy. Did some more tests ...

... are correct. On the 64 bits dll listed as belonging to...our surrogate infrastructure (because the bit model does not differ) and...not available in 64 bits (except on Windows Server 2003 x64...WS2008 both 64 bit. Whatever the order of registration, I only...typelib from the last registered DLL. Willy. Did some more tests...can't see any 64-bit dll's getting loaded in...

... are correct. On the 64 bits dll listed as belonging to...the code stored in the dll :) Why would he need to...They interoperate through IPC (when bit model differ). To achieve this...our surrogate infrastructure (because the bit model does not differ) and...not available in 64 bits (except on Windows Server 2003 x64...WS2008 both 64 bit. Whatever the order of registration, I only...

...? I mean if a 32 bits process requires this typelib (only) ... you are correct. On the 64 bits dll listed as belonging to our 32 bits process, ProcessExplorer tells me that the...) listed also in the 32 bits process, ProcessExplorer tells me that the...already present in the loaded 32-bit module? There must be another reason... process that loads a bunch of COM server DLL's... Willy....

... a TypeLib embedded in a 32 bits dll (or the opposite)? Using ProcessExplorer, ... about the location of this 64-bit DLL, nor should DependencyWalker show this DLL, are you sure you don't ...RPC? I mean if a 32 bits process requires this typelib (only) ... be very surprised if the 32-bit COM library would (could) load a..., only libraries with the same bit-ness can/will be loaded in ...

... to this problem: Can a 64 bits process (or dll) is able to access a TypeLib embedded in a 32 bits dll (or the opposite)? Using ProcessExplorer, we saw a 64 bits dll listed in our 32 bits process (and, yes, we are sure that this dll is 64 bits). Best regards, Olivier. Are you... is used when calling into the kernel. Besides ntdll.dll there are other dll's ...

... tlb are stored in both dlls. Olivier. "Olivier" <toon@toonworld.com>...question: We have developed à COM dll server. This latter is compiled...without any changes). On Windows 64 bits, the two versions may...64 bits, and so on...) I wonder also if the registration...before or after le 32 bits one?). It seems that it...

... tlb are stored in both dlls. Olivier. "Olivier" <toon@toonworld.com>... question: We have developed à COM dll server. This latter is compiled...without any changes). On Windows 64 bits, the two versions may...64 bits, and so on...) I wonder also if the registration...1830 (srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447) C:\Windows\SysWOW64\RegSvr32.exe: 12 800...

...the tlb are stored in both dlls. Olivier. "Olivier" <toon@toonworld.com> ...my question: We have developed à COM dll server. This latter is compiled in... (without any changes). On Windows 64 bits, the two versions may be...>> 64 bits, and so on...) I wonder also if the registration order.... If we register again our server, the error disappears. So, what ...