By Fooled Randomness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 8589 articles for 0.512 sec
On Sep 18, 6:34 pm, Mike Rozak <M...@mxac.com.au> wrote: > You might be interested in the > ideas:http://www.mxac.com.au/drt/WhyChoice.htm For my own style of evidence gathering, I personally found a lot of assumptions here without supporting data. This isn't to say I feel anything you say is wrong, per se. Simply that I can't determine one way or the other. So I'll just present my thoughts     

Group: rec.arts.intfiction · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in rec.arts.intfiction
Author: Jeff Nyman
Date: Sep 19, 2008 07:29

Michael Sierchio wrote: Theodore Tso wrote: As the old saying goes, "better to be silent, and thought to be a fool, and to speak, and remove all doubt." "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." Normally, I am fine with people believing all manner of silly things
Show full article (13.39Kb) · Show article thread
Ted T'so wrote: > At this point, you've just spent reams and reams of electrons stating > the obvious. Yes, for the second time, because some people *still* don't understand it. (It's quite obvious to you and me, not so obvious to the people who still don't get it.) > If the endpoint is compromised, no protocol is going to > help you. This is true regardless of whether you are talking     

Group: mailing.openssl.dev · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in mailing.openssl.dev
Author: "David Schwartz"
Date: Aug 11, 2008 02:56

Theodore Tso wrote: As the old saying goes, "better to be silent, and thought to be a fool, and to speak, and remove all doubt." "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." Normally, I am fine with people believing all manner of silly things, but not when they offer advice to others
Show full article (1.25Kb) · Show article thread
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:28:30PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > I didn't say you are vulnerable to a MITM attack that compromises the > endpoint. I said that if the endpoint is compromised, you are vulnerable to > MITM attacks. The attacker need not compromise the endpoint himself. He may > discover that a poorly-designed endpoint (even though it implement SSL > perfectly) is in fact compromised     

Group: mailing.openssl.dev · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in mailing.openssl.dev
Author: "David Schwartz"
Date: Aug 11, 2008 02:50

Kim <darwinexceptiontakethisout@verizon.net> wrote: 1. What mistake do you repeat over and over? Making a fool of myself on usenet. 2. Would you rather know how the world began or how it will end? Which world? I suspect that if we know enough about either the beginning or the end of the universe we can figure out the the rough outline of the other end of the timeline. 3. What
Show full article (2.71Kb) · Show article thread
In article <7ir3949qme61ui392deqauu40gjd9sgvt9@4ax.com>, Neal Eckhardt <neckhardt@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:33:04 -0400, "Kim" > <darwinexceptiontakethisout@verizon.net> wrote: > > >And clever, as well, has many definitions - most of which I'm not. I see > >clever in a "creative" sort of way, and I have a lot of shortcomings there. > > You must be kidding     

Group: mailing.openssl.dev · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in mailing.openssl.dev
Author: Michael Sierchio
Date: Aug 10, 2008 20:51

In article <g6ki0v$a0k$1@registered.motzarella.org>, kaymanDeleteThis@operamail.com says... "The test takes a few seconds to complete. When its done you'll see a page where the transaction ID and source port randomness will be rated either GREAT, GOOD, or POOR. If you see a POOR rating, we recommend that contact your ISP and ask if they have plans to upgrade their nameserver software
Show full article (0.68Kb) · Show article thread
In article <g6ki0v$a0k$1@registered.motzarella.org>, kaymanDeleteThis@operamail.com says... > "The test takes a few seconds to complete. When its done you'll see a page > where the transaction ID and source port randomness will be rated either > GREAT, GOOD, or POOR. If you see a POOR rating, we recommend that contact > your ISP and ask if they have plans to upgrade their nameserver software     

Group: mailing.openssl.dev · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in mailing.openssl.dev
Author: Theodore Tso
Date: Aug 10, 2008 19:57

Jen wrote: Mary wrote: Veronique wrote: On Jul 27, 12:46 pm, Mary <mrfeath...@aol.com> wrote: dan wrote: What's that Lassie? You say that Guillermo el Gato fell down the old alt.fan.cecil-adams mine and will die if we don't mount a rescue by Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:35:59 +0200: 5. What is the difference between a number two pencil and any other
Show full article (1.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: darkon
Date: Aug 4, 2008 10:27

Show full article (2.01Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Hactar
Date: Jul 31, 2008 10:36

Show full article (0.68Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.computer.security · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in alt.computer.security
Author: Andrew Rossmann
Date: Jul 28, 2008 13:51

Show full article (0.97Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.comp.freeware · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in alt.comp.freeware
Author: Andrew Rossmann
Date: Jul 28, 2008 13:51

Show full article (0.97Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for By Fooled Randomness in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Ulo Melton
Date: Jul 27, 2008 22:36

Show full article (1.79Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next