Boxboys
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 14 articles for 0.303 sec
The real problem about "inspectors", is that the real good and stable ones, uses legacy code (aka, code based on delphi designtime units), or a massive and strange POO class spaghetti. Long time ago, I find a inspector that mimic delphi 5 inspector 100%%, I improve it, remove the delphi designtime needed (with a legacy code from another inspector pack), so, if you really want, you need to     

Group: borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general
Author: Sérgio Alexandre
Date: May 4, 2008 13:21

Anyone have experience with the freeware set of controls, specifically the TInspector, from CodeBot? This control blows up on run if you've populated it at design time -and- if you try populating it with anything other than a text fields at run time. We've been discussing it, trying to find a solution, here: http://3dbuzz.com/vbforum/showthread.php?t=165910 Sorry, this the only place I can
Show full article (1.06Kb) · Show article thread
"8sub" <sr4sub@hotspammail.co.uk> wrote: >Semaphore signalling is to be re-introduced on the Brighton line at Redhill. >Redhill 'A' and 'B' boxes have been restored to their former glory and >locking fitters have been flown in from India to ensure the two frames will >be ready for commissioning. > >The commissioning date will be 00.01 on the 1st April 2008. > >Former Redhill 'B' boxboys     

Group: borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general
Author: Dave Keighan
Date: May 4, 2008 09:11

Semaphore signalling is to be re-introduced on the Brighton line at Redhill. Redhill 'A' and 'B' boxes have been restored to their former glory and locking fitters have been flown in from India to ensure the two frames will be ready for commissioning. The commissioning date will be 00.01 on the 1st April 2008. Former Redhill 'B' boxboys are expected to be in attendance at Redhill 'B' to
Show full article (0.51Kb)
greg wrote: > Sigh. > > This has already been responded to at acjfk where it was pointed out no > theory was being expounded and that additionally, I do not believe they > were plotters in any conspiracy. That David felt the need to repost it > here after having that pointed out, shows how little (so far, nothing) > by way of actual rebuttal he has. > > I pity the credibility of those     

Group: uk.railway · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in uk.railway
Author: Tony Polson
Date: Mar 21, 2008 02:58

Sigh. This has already been responded to at acjfk where it was pointed out no theory was being expounded and that additionally, I do not believe they were plotters in any conspiracy. That David felt the need to repost it here after having that pointed out, shows how little (so far, nothing) by way of actual rebuttal he has. I pity the credibility of those who want to treat this as a game
Show full article (0.60Kb) · Show article thread
Good Lord. What an idiotic theory. (Although, of course, not the first time I've seen it around these parts). Now, all you need to do is figure out WHY the brother-&-sister conspirator team of "Buell & Linnie Mae" didn't go that EXTRA step toward framing everybody's favorite "patsy" for all 1963 Dallas murders by NOT giving the DPD a more accurate description of the paper bag (length-wise,     

Group: uk.railway · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in uk.railway
Author: 8sub
Date: Mar 21, 2008 00:34

Walt wrote: On 9 Mar, 21:10, greg <magicremovebul...@octa4.net.au> wrote: David Von Pein wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/bff8060438c3a461 Good Lord. What an idiotic theory. (Although, of course, not the first time I've seen it around these parts). How unusual. You ascribe the word "theory" to what is merely a set of established
Show full article (0.51Kb)
On 9 Mar, 21:10, greg <magicremovebul...@octa4.net.au> wrote: > David Von Pein wrote: > > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/bff8060438c3a461 > > > Good Lord. What an idiotic theory. (Although, of course, not the first > > time I've seen it around these parts). > > How unusual. You ascribe the word "theory" to what is merely a set of > established facts and pertinent questions     

Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.assassination.jfk
Author: Anthony Marsh
Date: Mar 12, 2008 21:12

David Von Pein wrote: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/bff8060438c3a461 Good Lord. What an idiotic theory. (Although, of course, not the first time I've seen it around these parts). How unusual. You ascribe the word "theory" to what is merely a set of established facts and pertinent questions based on those facts. Now, all you need
Show full article (2.07Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.assassination.jfk
Author: greg
Date: Mar 11, 2008 10:33

Show full article (1.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.assassination.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.assassination.jfk
Author: David Von Pein
Date: Mar 10, 2008 18:47

Show full article (1.14Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.conspiracy.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.conspiracy.jfk
Author: greg
Date: Mar 10, 2008 14:06

Show full article (6.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.conspiracy.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.conspiracy.jfk
Author: Walt
Date: Mar 10, 2008 10:01

Show full article (4.01Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.conspiracy.jfk · Group Profile · Search for Boxboys in alt.conspiracy.jfk
Author: greg
Date: Mar 9, 2008 20:10

Show full article (2.66Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · next