On May 14, 11:48 pm, Chris Menzel <cmen...@remove-this.tamu.edu> wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2008 11:18:03 -0700 (PDT), LauLuna <laureanol...@yahoo.es> said: On May 13, 1:12 am, Jason Glumidge <Jason.Glumi...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, I was wondering if I could get the benefit of your collective knowledge: I am looking for a word in philosophy (whether that
On Jul 1, 9:14 pm, Rupert <rupertmccal...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Jun 27, 3:56 am, Rudy Canoza <rudy-can...@excite.com> wrote: Fuckwit David Harrison, hopelessly overmatched ignorant cracker, lied: On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, jesucris...@netscape.net wrote: we need a 'fuckwit vs goober fAQ' or something... you dig? The history is clear: I have crushed
MoeBlee wrote: On May 26, 1:44 pm, MoeBlee <jazzm...@hotmail.com> wrote: Aside from Robinson's own particular *N, we can look at this even more simply by this illustration: First order PA has its standard model. The universe of that model is w, which is denumerable. But any first order theory that has a model with a denumerable universe also has models with uncountable
William Elliot wrote: On Wed, 27 Dec 2006, Rupert wrote: | Make up your mind. You were the one who gave us the definition. | We're telling you what follows from it. Maybe you misread the definition. I don't think so. As the definition has been removed from these replies, it's but my word to yours. In http://groups.google.com/group/alt
David Bernier wrote: William Hughes wrote: Sue wrote: "Jim Ferry" <corklebath@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1158263413.708768.123050@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... jaapsch wrote: Proginoskes wrote: Panties On Head wrote: [...] The word random is horribly ambiguous. [...] Not really. The
