Basicali
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 6 articles for 0.241 sec
On 28 Jan, 21:09, Richard Ford <doorman.f...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 28 Jan, 19:36, ho...@lightlink.com wrote: > > > > > In alt.clearing.technology Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> many statements that there was research to back his theories up, > > >> Dianetics was presented as a SCIENCE with social applications. He made > > >> however they were not presented.     

Group: alt.clearing.technology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.clearing.technology
Author: Roadrunner
Date: Jan 29, 2010 02:02

On 28 Jan, 21:09, Richard Ford <doorman.f...@googlemail.com> wrote: On 28 Jan, 19:36, ho...@lightlink.com wrote: In alt.clearing.technology Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote: many statements that there was research to back his theories up, Dianetics was presented as a SCIENCE with social applications. He made however they were not presented.
Show full article (1.59Kb) · Show article thread
This is a 100 percent content free posting. Claiming that Dianetics didn't come from serious scientific research, experimentation, theorizing, is absurd as earlier works attest. The mere fact that Dianetics doesn't have a lot of peer review bears little relevance, neither did Gallileo, or Mendeleev, Mendel and a whole host of other scientific pioneers. Some of us may     

Group: alt.religion.scientology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.religion.scientology
Author: Roadrunner
Date: Jan 29, 2010 02:02

This is a 100 percent content free posting. Claiming that Dianetics didn't come from serious scientific research, experimentation, theorizing, is absurd as earlier works attest. The mere fact that Dianetics doesn't have a lot of peer review bears little relevance, neither did Gallileo, or Mendeleev, Mendel and a whole host of other scientific pioneers. Some of us may
Show full article (1.59Kb) · Show article thread
On 28 Jan, 19:36, ho...@lightlink.com wrote: > In alt.clearing.technology Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> many statements that there was research to back his theories up, > >> Dianetics was presented as a SCIENCE with social applications. He made > >> however they were not presented. > > > If you do not search, you will not find. Such research is available. > >      YOu     

Group: alt.clearing.technology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.clearing.technology
Author: homer
Date: Jan 28, 2010 16:06

On 28 Jan, 19:36, ho...@lightlink.com wrote: In alt.clearing.technology Roadrunner <roadrunner.eni...@gmail.com> wrote: many statements that there was research to back his theories up, Dianetics was presented as a SCIENCE with social applications. He made however they were not presented. If you do not search, you will not find. Such research is available.      YOu
Show full article (2.67Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.religion.scientology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.religion.scientology
Author: homer
Date: Jan 28, 2010 16:06

Show full article (2.67Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.clearing.technology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.clearing.technology
Author: Richard Ford
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:09

Show full article (1.37Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.religion.scientology · Group Profile · Search for Basicali in alt.religion.scientology
Author: Richard Ford
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:09

Show full article (1.37Kb) · Show article thread