On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 23:46:21 -0800, Tony Elka <shadowlane@shadowlane.com> wrote: mike@blackcat.demon.co.uk (Mike Dickson) wrote: Well if it isn't science *fiction* then what is it? It sure ain't whack-off material. I dunno. That stewardess that puts Heywood's pen back in his pocket looks pretty bangable.

..." went off the air. This guy could have done a hilarious weekly "Bitch Management" segment, uncovering the "feminism" in every male/female interaction, oblivious to the reality that today's bangable young "bitches" hardly know what feminism is/was, and their primary role model is more likely Paris Hilton than Betty Friedan... Na, the man show actually had good writers. A lot ...

...she bit my dick!....Waaaaaah! It's too bad that "The Man Show" went off the air. This guy could have done a hilarious weekly "Bitch Management" segment, uncovering the "feminism" in every male/female interaction, oblivious to the reality that today's bangable young "bitches" hardly know what feminism is/was, and their primary role model is more likely Paris Hilton than Betty Friedan...

...if a person wishes to take an existential life-stance based upon materialism, then that is a CHOICE... not an obvious compliance with nature. We do not KNOW what, if anything was bangable, wherewith a Big Bang occurred. Nothing in physics enables any scientist -- materialistic, theistic, deistic, or any-istic -- to (in contemporary physics) beyond that bang... nor beyond what happens...