Bad Debt Worthlessness
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 1029 articles for 0.512 sec
> In 2000, I joined a private golf club owned by the developer. I paid > $50,000 and $40,000 was supposed to be "equity" that would come back to me > without interest at the time when I resigned. OK, I'm not sure how club memberships are handled (you'll need to check on this), but for the sake of argument I'll assume that you bought an asset for $40,000. > Now the developer wants to sell     

Group: us.taxes · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in us.taxes
Author: Jim Kingdon
Date: Sep 8, 2007 13:45

"Charles Aulds" <caulds@hiwaay.net> wrote in message news:pan.2007.08.13.21.00.40.467761@hiwaay.net... On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:38:19 -0500, zzpat wrote: Central banks pumped more money into the system than they did after 911 so this is/was big, very big. If they hadn't done what they did, the global economies would have collapsed. Let me see if I understand what happened
Show full article (1.60Kb) · Show article thread
"Charles Aulds" <caulds@hiwaay.net> wrote in message news:pan.2007.08.13.21.00.40.467761@hiwaay.net... > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:38:19 -0500, zzpat wrote: > > >> Central banks pumped more money into the system than they did after 911 >> so this is/was big, very big. If they hadn't done what they did, the >> global economies would have collapsed. > > > Let me see if I understand what happened     

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.society.liberalism
Author: John Galt
Date: Aug 13, 2007 15:30

On Jul 27, 10:25 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: Vide...@tcq.net wrote: On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: well, i ask you this again. if the bear sterns stuff is so good, Who says that? I thought that the issue was that some of the assets were NOT good, and that is why JPM didn't want to buy them. great distortion/distraction, Yes, truth
Show full article (4.32Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 27, 10:25 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: > Vide...@tcq.net wrote: > >On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: > >> > well, i ask you this again. if the bear sterns stuff is so good, > > >> Who says that? I thought that the issue was that some of the assets > >> were NOT good, and that is why JPM didn't want to buy them. > > > great distortion/distraction, > > Yes, truth     

Group: alt.politics.usa.republican · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.politics.usa.republican
Author: John Galt
Date: Aug 13, 2007 15:30

Video61@tcq.net wrote: On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: well, i ask you this again. if the bear sterns stuff is so good, Who says that? I thought that the issue was that some of the assets were NOT good, and that is why JPM didn't want to buy them. great distortion/distraction, Yes, truth always appears that way to you. they were the assets
Show full article (4.32Kb) · Show article thread
Video61@tcq.net wrote: >On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: >> > well, i ask you this again. if the bear sterns stuff is so good, >> >> Who says that? I thought that the issue was that some of the assets >> were NOT good, and that is why JPM didn't want to buy them. >> > > great distortion/distraction, Yes, truth always appears that way to you. > they were the assets     

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.society.liberalism
Author: Video61
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:58

On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: Vide...@tcq.net wrote: On Jul 26, 11:47 pm, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: Probably not. But since you don't know what the term means (even the radical idea that it involves a debtor not having to pay a debt owed to a creditor), you probably don't see that. Or if you do, who is the debtor and who is the
Show full article (6.03Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 27, 1:14 am, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: > Vide...@tcq.net wrote: > >On Jul 26, 11:47 pm, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: > >> >> Probably not. But since you don't know what the term means (even the > >> >> radical idea that it involves a debtor not having to pay a debt owed > >> >> to a creditor), you probably don't see that. Or if you do, who is the > >> >> debtor and who is the     

Group: alt.politics.usa.republican · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.politics.usa.republican
Author: Video61
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:58

On Jun 28, 1:55 pm, alexy <nos...@asbry.net> wrote: Vide...@tcq.net wrote: On Jun 28, 11:02 am, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:35:43 -0700, 4105 Dead <zepp22114...@finestplanet.com> wrote: Although I don't expect much from someone who can't tell the difference between an asset and a liability. The Fed has not assumed the debt.
Show full article (6.03Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.society.liberalism
Author: alexy
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:25

Show full article (4.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa.republican · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.politics.usa.republican
Author: alexy
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:25

Show full article (4.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.society.liberalism
Author: Video61
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:12

Show full article (4.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.politics.usa.republican · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.politics.usa.republican
Author: Video61
Date: Jul 27, 2008 08:12

Show full article (4.46Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.society.liberalism · Group Profile · Search for Bad Debt Worthlessness in alt.society.liberalism
Author: Video61
Date: Jun 28, 2008 13:15

Show full article (2.39Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next